The Manager Mail Motors & Anr. v. Manoj Kumar

Delhi High Court · 25 Sep 2019 · 2019:DHC:4912
Najmi Waziri
MAC.APP. No.937/2017
2019:DHC:4912
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a motor accident compensation award, holding that issues not raised before the MACT cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC.APP. No.937/2017 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 25.09.2019
MAC.APP. 937/2017 & CM APPL. 38612/2017, 38610/2017
THE MANAGER MAIL MOTORS & ANR ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC alongwith Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate.
VERSUS
MANOJ KUMAR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT

1. This appeal impugns the award of compensation dated 22.04.2017 passed by the learned MACT in MACP No. 8A/16 on two grounds: (i) that the deceased did not have a valid driving licence and (ii) that since he was not duly licensed to drive a motor vehicle, he cannot presume to be competent or skilled to drive his motor vehicle, therefore, there would be a corollary contributory negligence apropos the motor-vehicular accident.

2. On a query put to the learned counsel for the appellant whether this issue was raised before the learned MACT, the answer is in the negative.

3. The impugned order shows that there is no discussion apropos this issue. The evident reason is that in their reply, the appellant had not raised any such contention. 2019:DHC:4912 MAC.APP. No.937/2017

4. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that indeed no such issue has been raised in the reply to the Claim Petition or during the arguments before the learned MACT.

5. In view of the above, no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order.

6. There is no merit in the appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed. The pending applications are also dismissed.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 RW