ANGELIQUE INTERNATIONAL LTD v. NBCC(INDIA) LIMITED AND ANR.

Delhi High Court · 25 Sep 2019 · 2019:DHC:7383-DB
G.S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani
W.P.(C) 12040/2018
2019:DHC:7383-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging a tender after award but granted liberty to the petitioner to separately challenge the forfeiture of earnest money.

Full Text
Translation output
$-10 and 11 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 12040/2018 and C.M. Nos.46614-15/2018
ANGELIQUE INTERNATIONAL LTD Petitioner
Through; Mr. R.K. Sanghi,Advocate with Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Advocate.
VERSUS
NBCC(INDIA)LIMITED AND ANR. Respondents
Through: Ms.Tajinder Virdi, Advocate for respondent No.l.
Mr. O.P. Gaggar,Advocate for respondent No.2.
W.P.(C)12041/2018 and C.M.Nos.46616-17/2018
ANGELIQUE INTERNATIONAL LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Sanghi, Advocate with Mr. Satyendra Kumar,Advocate.
VERSUS
!
NBCC(INDIA)LIMITED AND ANR. Respondents
Through: Ms.Tajinder Virdi,Advocate for respondent No.l.
Mr.O.P. Gaggar,Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANl
25.09.2019 Since the tender has been awarded, the writ petitions are not
2019:DHC:7383-DB pressed. Prayer (b) is kept open as prayed by the petitioner for the reason that during the pendency of the writ petitions, the petitioner has been informed that earnest money has been forfeited.
Liberty as prayed is granted to challenge the subsequent order i offorfeiture ofthe earnest money.
Petitions are disposed ofin terms ofaforesaid observations.
G.S.SISTANI,J.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI,J.
SEPTEMBER 25,2019 Ne 2019:DHC:7383-DB
JUDGMENT