Durga Dass Bansal & Anr v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 15 Nov 2019 · 2019:DHC:7683
Vibhu Bakhru
W.P.(CRL)1156/2018
2019:DHC:7683
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their criminal petitions with liberty to raise their contentions before the appropriate court and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

Full Text
Translation output
jo $~9& 10 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)1156/2018 and CrI.M.A.No.7033/2018
DURGA DASS BANSAL & ANR Petitioners
Through; Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mayank Ahuja,Advocates.
Durga Dass Bansal, petitioner in person.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with MsJyoti Babbar,Advocate.
SI Shekhar,PS ShalimarBagh.
Ms Supriya Juneja and Ms Rimjhim Naudiyal,Advocates for R-2.
AND
W.P.rCRLl 1266/2018 and CrI.M.A.No.7669/2018 MUKESH BANSAL & ANR
Through:
STATE & ANR
VERSUS
Through:
1. filed.
Petitioners Mr Mukesh Gupta and Mayank Ahuja,Advocates.
Durga Dass Bansal, petitioner in person.
Respondents Mr Avi Singh,ASC for State with Mr
TanujBhadana,Advocates.
SI Shekhar,PS Shalimar Bagh.
Ms Supriya Juneja and Ms Rimjhim Naudiyal,Advocatesfor R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
15.11.2019 After some arguments,learned ASC states thata chargesheethas been
2019:DHC:7683
ORDER

2. In view ofthe above,the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeksto withdraw the present petitions,with liberty to agitate all contentions before the concerned Court.

3. The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. All pending applications are also disposed of.

4. All rights and contentions ofthe petitioners are reserved.

5. It is fiirther clarified that if an application for exemption is filed, the same would be duly considered. VIBHUBAKHRU,J NOVEMBER 15,2019 RK