Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 5000/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 15.11.2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 15.11.2019
CRL.M.C. 5000/2019
NARENDER & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate
NARENDER & ORS ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE& ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State with Insp. Nitin Kumar and SI Madan
Mohan, P.S. Ranhola.
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for the State with Insp. Nitin Kumar and SI Madan
Mohan, P.S. Ranhola.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
347/2018 dated 29.04.2018 registered at Police Station Ranhola instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
Notice issued.
Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 01.12.2016 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
2019:DHC:5992
Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.
347/2018 dated 29.04.2018 registered at Police Station Ranhola instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
Notice issued.
Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 01.12.2016 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the
2019:DHC:5992
CRL.M.C. 5000/2019 petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from
17.12.2016.
The petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated March 2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Madan Mohan of Police Station Ranhola and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.
For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 347/2018 dated
29.04.2018 registered at Police Station Ranhola and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.
The petition is allowed accordingly.
Dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 15, 2019 Aj 2019:DHC:5992
17.12.2016.
The petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated March 2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Madan Mohan of Police Station Ranhola and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.
For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 347/2018 dated
29.04.2018 registered at Police Station Ranhola and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.
The petition is allowed accordingly.
Dasti.
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
NOVEMBER 15, 2019 Aj 2019:DHC:5992