Full Text
Translation output
$-16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TEST.CAS. 18/2013
KAPIL KHANNA Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.C. Kalra & Ms. Indra Mani, Advs.
TEST.CAS. 18/2013
KAPIL KHANNA Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.C. Kalra & Ms. Indra Mani, Advs.
VERSUS
THE STATE& ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra & Mr. Deepankar Kataria,Advs.for R-2.
Through: Mr. Ajay Malhotra & Mr. Deepankar Kataria,Advs.for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW
28.11.2019
28.11.2019
ORDER
1. The counsel for the petitioner states that in view ofsettlement arrived at,the petitioner withdrawsthe petition.
2. The counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the settlement is under duress.
3. The respondent no.3 is stated to be the father ofthe petitioner and from the factum ofthe petitioner, present in Court,stating that he needs to talk to his father, it is evident that there are no differences between the petitioner and the respondent no.3.
4. The counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner will enforce the settlement.
5. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the parties to bear their own costs.
RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW,J NOVEMBER 28,2019 'gsr'