South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Veena Chugh

POONAM CHANDNA AND ANR Respondent W.PTCJ 1355/2017 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPOFL\TION Petitioner versus W.P.tC)3035/2017 & connected mattei's I'ae.e "■■. yfl<f ". ■ • ■ ■ ■.,•,.... ---.^ ft - • • -.. • ■ - - -.; 0 ■;■ ■ • ■,; I SNEH PRABHA MEHTA AND ANR Respondent + W.P.fG) 1385/2017

VERSUS

SANJAY KUMAR & ANR.. I Respondent + W.P.fC) 1444/2017...

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Petitioner versus' ■ • ■ SAN.IAY KALRA & ANR ' ' ■ Respondent + W.P.fCI 2417/2017

VERSUS

JANAK VOHRA & ANR ' ■ • ' Respondent -f- W.P.ICI 2469/2017 ' ■ • ■ • ■ versus. ' M/S CORPORATEPROFESSIQNALS(P) LTD.&ANR. ■ •...... Respondents + W.P.ICI 25/2017

VERSUS

AHMED SAYEED AND ORS Respondent -i- W.P.(C) 2973/2017 ' versus.

SHEENA KOHLI 8c ANR Respondents +, W.P.fC) 2978/2017 versus ' ■ DEOVRAT MISHRA & ANR Respondent -i- W.P.fCI 5844/2017 EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner, versus ■ ■ SRI GANGA SAGAR BHAGWAN CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR. ■ Respondents + VV.P.(G) 5971/2017 ' ' ■ versus.

RAJIV DHIMAN Respondent + W.P.(G) 5975/2017.. ^ versus: ASWANIKUMAliMALIK & ANR Respondent ■ " W.P.IG) 6079/2017 W.P.(C)3035/2017 & connected matters l^ago 3

VERSUS

PUSHPA RANI.1AIN AND ANR. Respondenl -i- W.P.(C)7/2017

VERSUS

GIRISH KUMAR AND ANR ' Respondent -f- W.P.(C)773/2017

VERSUS

SHANKAR GABA AND ANR Respondent + W.P.(C)357/2018 V versus ■ MAHESH SINGAL AND ANR. Respondents + W.P.(C)8866/2016.

NORTH DELHI-MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner versus SHRIINDU MALHOTRA ' Respondenl i- W.P.(C)8873/2016

VERSUS

VEENA TUTEJA Respondent ■i W.P.tCI 8901/2016

VERSUS

SHRI GURDEEP SINGH Respondent W.P.fCI 8902/2016

VERSUS

SHRI ASHWANI KUMAR Respondent ■ -t- W.P.tCl 8903/2016 versus.lATINDER RAJ SINGH..... Respondent + W.P.tCD 8904/2016

VERSUS

SPIRI RAJIV Respondent + W.P.ICJ 8944/2016 versus ■ BALJEET SINGH •;.... Respondent + W.P.IC) 8946/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner '

VERSUS

W''.P,(C)3035/2017 & cdnnectecl matters -• ■;r::i-- •. V'-" - /•.-' /> + MOHll CHADHA ■ ■ ' i • Respondent W.PdO 8950/2016 \ ' versus' '." ■ i RAKESHNARANG Respondent W'.P.fC^ 8951/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION...... Petitioner versus ■.,.. SUDHIR KUMAR BATLA Respondent' + W.P.(C) 8952/2016;

VERSUS

SURJIT SINGH Respondent + W.PTCI 8953/2016. d NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPOR/VTION Petitioner versus SOURABH MALHOTRA ■ ■ * • Respondent' + W.P.rCI 8954/2016

VERSUS

RAJESH ■ Respondent - W.P.tC) 8955/2016 versus...

SHRI SUBHASH CHADHA Respondent + W.P.tC) 8957/2016 ■ versus SUBHASH BABBAR Respondent + W.P.fCI 8958/2016 versus ■ ■ ■.. LALITNAYYAR ■ - ■...;.~Respondent + W.P.tCI 8959/2016 0 versus AJAY CHANANA Respondent + W.P.tC) 8960/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner. ■ versus, RAJ CHANDHOK;...... Respondent -t- W.P.(CI 8961/2016 ■ NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner versus VIRENDER SINGH RAWAT..... Respondent W.i^.(C)3035/20i[7] & connectedmatters; '.... _ Page 5 + w.i'jq s962/2nr[6]

VERSUS

SHRI DhV KUMAR RAWAL Respondent W.P.fq 12/2017 "south DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Petitioner versus DR.SHIKHA SHARMA & ANR. Respondents -!- W.P.(q 5161/2018 SEEMA DEVI KHANDELWAL AND ANR Petitioners versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. Respondents ■i-, W..P.(q 8651/2017

VERSUS

COMBINED COURIERS PVTLTD AND, ANR Respondents,-i- W.P.fCI 8654/2017

VERSUS

OAU 1 AM GUHA AND ANR Respondents W.P.fCI 8662/2017

VERSUS

SANDEEP.IAIN AND ORS Respondents I- W.P.rq 8663/2017

VERSUS

BHATIA SHIPPING PVT LTD AND ANR Respondents + W.P.fq 8997/2017, ■ ■ ■ versus, TRIPAT DATTA AND ANR Respondents - I- W.P.fq 9008/2017 o versus VIJAY SIKRI & ANR Respondents + ■ W.P./q 9524/2017.. versus, INDU GUPTA & ANR. Respondent -I- W.P.ICO 2702/2019

VERSUS

SMT.

SAVITA NARANG AND ANR. Respondents ■, i VV,P.(C)303.S/20 17 & connected matters Page 6 IP # Present: Ms.Reema Khorana and Mr.Kartik RathiAdvs.for SDMC in 1-7. Mr.SriHarsha Peechara.SC with Ms.kriti Sinha. Adv. for SDMC in 1-8 & 9. Ms.Manika Tripathi Pandey,ASC for SDMC in I-10. Mr.AJjay Aroraa andMr.Kapil Dutta,Advs.for SDMC in 1-15 to 45,69 to 76. Ms.Puja Kalra SC for North DMC in 1-46 to 65 Mr.Ajay Digpaul and Mr.Soumavya Karmakar,Advs.for SDMC in 1-66. Mr.Amit Singh Chauhan,Adv.for R-2/Monitormg Committee. Mr.Manqj Kumar,Adv.for the respondent in 1-5 Mr.Harish Kohli.Adv.for the respondent in 1-16. ' ' ' Mr.N.Pandey and Mr.Pranay KuamqAdv.for R-2 in 1-18 to 22,43 & 44. Mr.Arvind Kumar,Adv.for R-1 in 1-26. Mr.Arshish Garg and Mr.Hari Bhuvan Khurana,Advs.for R-1 in 1-29. Mr..Aiayinder Sangwan, lylr.Sachin Choudhary, Mr.Prashant Sharma and Mr.Avi Dhankaf,Advs.for R-1 in 1-30. ■ Mr.K.Sunil and Mr.Sushil Tripathi, Advs.for R-1 in 1-32. ■Mr.S.N.Choudhri,.Adv. for the respondent in 1-38. Mr.Ripu Daman BhardwaJ, CGSC vvith Mr.T.P.Singh, Adv. for R-2/U0I in 1-46. Mr.Kailash Vasdev, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Shreyans Singhvi, Ms.Ekta Mehta and Mr.Urnrao Singh Rawat, ADvs. for the respondent in1-46, 57, 60, 61, 62. Mr.Naresh Kaushik and Mr.Laksha'y.luneja, Advs. for the respondent inl-66 Mr.N.K.Kantawala and Mr.Satyender Chahar, Advs. for R-1 in 1-69 Mr.D.K.Rustagi and Ms.Vidhi.lain, Advs. for the respondent in 1-69 & 70 M.s.Lfsha Nand.ni and Mr.Biju P. Raman, Advs. for R-1 in 1-72. Mv.S.K.Bhaduri and Mr.Madhukar Bansiwal. Advs. for R-1 in 1-75. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja and Ms.Prerna Singh, Advs. for R-1 in 1-76. Mr.S.K. Bhaduri, Adv. for Indu Gupta in 1-76., CORAM: 1 HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE JAYANT NATH \ ■ ■ ■ ' • • i ORDER I - % 18.12.2019 '■ 1., The facts of the present bunch of Writ Petitions are somewhat akin and identical to,W.P.(C) 8647/2017 titled SDMC vs. Brigadier (Retd) A S Popli And Anr. The submissions of learned counsel appearing for the parties including learned counsel appearing for the Supreme court appointed Monitoring Committee are also identical.

2. Today this court in W.P.(C) 8647/2017 has passed the following directions:- 'T-7.Keeping in view the status report filed by the Monitoring Committee and the aforesaid, it would be for the petitioner to take further appropriate steps as per law/as per the directions passed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner is \V.P.(C)3035/2017 & connected matters Pane 7 ■ - > ^ ' ^>' iTee to approach the Monitoring Committee/Supreme Court for appropriate directions/further proceedings. > IS.With the above,the petition stands disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of."

4. With the above, these petitions stand disposed of. All pending applications, if any.also stand disposed of. 5, Copy otthis order,be given Dasrilindersignatures ofthe Court Master. ' DECEMBER 18,2019 n, I JAYANT NATH,J. W.P.(C)3035/2017&connected matters Page 8-