Sajili Vasisht v. Aditya Agarwal

Delhi High Court · 06 Dec 2019 · 2019:DHC:7854-DB
G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh
MAT.APP.(F.C.)328/2018 & CM APPL 53647/2018
2019:DHC:7854-DB
civil other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court ordered compliance with payment obligations, allowed procedural exemption, and dismissed an unpressed petition in a financial dispute between Sajili Vasisht and Aditya Agarwal.

Full Text
Translation output
(p HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MAT.APP.(F.C.)328/2018&CM APPL 53647/2018
SAJILIVASISHT Appellant
Through Mr.Vishal Singh,Mr.M.P.Bhargava and Ms.Jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advocates.
VERSUS
ADITYA AGARWAL
Through (
CONT.CAS(C).1080/2019
SAJILI VASISHT
Through
VERSUS
ADITYA AGARWAL
Respondent Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal and Mr. B.
Venkatraman, Advocates for the respondent along with respondent in person.
Appellant Mr.Vishal Singh,Mr.M.P.Bhargava and
Ms.jyoti Kataria Bajaj, Advocates.
Respondent
Through Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal and Mr. B.
Venkatraman, Advocates for the respondent along with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE JYOTISINGH
06.12.2019
MAT.APP.(F.C.)328/2018 & CM APPL 53647/2018
In compliance with the previous order, Rs.4.0 lakhs stand paid.
Respondent who is present in Court submits that another Rs.2.0 lakhs would be paid on or before 31.12.2019.
List on 10.02.2020.
2019:DHC:7854-DB X
CM.APPL 52636/2019 fExemption^ in CONT.CASfO.1080/2019
Exemption allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CONT.CAS(a.l080/2019 The petition is dismissed as not pressed atthis stage. s
G.S.SISTANI,J DECEMBER 06,2019 pst
MAT.APP.(F.C.)328/2018 & Coni.Cas(C).1080/20I9
JYOTISINGH,J 2019:DHC:7854-DB
JUDGMENT