Sandy Shokeen v. State

Delhi High Court · 23 Dec 2019 · 2019:DHC:7206
Suresh Kumar Kait
CRL.M.C. 6682/2019
2019:DHC:7206
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a 2012 FIR and related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and payment of compensation, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 6682/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 23.12.2019
CRL.M.C. 6682/2019
SANDY SHOKEEN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State with SI
Hemant Kumar, PS – Nihal Vihar
Mr. Ankit Singh, Advs. for R-2 and 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
CRL. M.A. 43426/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No. 97/2012 dated 12.05.2012 registered at Police Station – Nihal Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2019:DHC:7206

6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. The petitioner and respondent nos. 2 & 3 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 21.12.2019, whereby petitioner has agreed to pay an amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) to the respondent No. 2 and an amount of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) to the respondent No. 3 (injured). A demand draft bearing NO. 018261 for an amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) has been handed over to respondent No. 2 and demand draft bearing No. 018262 for amount of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) has been handed over to respondent No. 3.

9. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are personally present in Court with learned counsel – Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocate and they have been identified by SI Hemant Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

10. Learned APP has opposed the present petition and submits that the settlement amount is very less and moreover, the case was registered in the year 2012, due to which the Government machinery came into force and public time has been wasted. It is prayed that if this Court is inclined to quash the FIR, the compensation amount may be increased and heavy cost may be imposed on the petitioner.

11. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the Court, has come forward to pay an amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) in favour of the respondent NO. 2 and ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) to respondent No. 3/ injured within two days in addition to the amount, which has already been paid. The petitioner is, accordingly, directed to pay an amount of ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) by Demand Draft in favour of the respondent No. 2 and an amount of ₹25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) in favour of the respondent No. 3 within two days and receipt of the same shall be furnished to the IO of the case.

12. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition may be allowed.

13. Keeping in view the settlement arrived and the said amount, as directed to be paid, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR No. 97/2012 and emanating proceedings thereto.

14. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 97/2012 dated 12.05.2012 registered at Police Station – Nihal Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

15. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

3,160 characters total

16. Order dasti.

JUDGE DECEMBER 23, 2019 PB