Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)385/2020,CM APPL.1054/2020(stay)
NIRDOSH GAUTAM and ORS. Petitioners
W.P.(C)385/2020,CM APPL.1054/2020(stay)
NIRDOSH GAUTAM and ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVT.OFNOT OFDELHIAND ORS. Respondents
W.P.(C)387/2020,CM APPL.1057/2020(stay)
KULDEBP KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioners
KULDEBP KUMAR AND ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVT.OF NOT OFDELHIAND ORS. Respondents
W.P.(C)388/2020,CM APPL.1060/2020(stay)
SANDEEP and ORS. Petitioners
SANDEEP and ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVT.OF NOT OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents
W.P.(C)397/2020,CM APPL.1093/2020(stay)
AMARJEET AND ORS. Petitioners
AMARJEET AND ORS. Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVT.OF NOT OF DELHIAND ORS. Respondents Present; Mr.S.K.Malik,Advocate for petitioners in all items.
Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel for GNCTD(Services) with Mr.N.K.Singh,Advocate in all items.
Mr.Rajesh Gogna,CGSC with Mrs.Niddhi Raman,G.P.for R-5, R-6 & R-7.
Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel for GNCTD(Services) with Mr.N.K.Singh,Advocate in all items.
Mr.Rajesh Gogna,CGSC with Mrs.Niddhi Raman,G.P.for R-5, R-6 & R-7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
28.01.2020 ^ After some hearing, counsel for the petitioners submits that the grounds raised at the time of hearing of the O.A., were not considered by Central
Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal'). Counsel submits that various judgments cited, relied upon and annexed with the O.A. are also not reflected in the
2020:DHC:3927-DB impugned order.
Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel for Government ofNCT ofDelhi
(Services),submits thatthere is no infirmity in the order passed bythe Tribunal.
She submits that the appointments would obviously have to be made as per the
Recruitment Rules ofthe year 2014 when the vacancies were notified and the advertisement was published; and subsequent directions issued by the Central
Governmenton 07.01.2016 cannotbe applied.
Atthis stage,counsel for the petitioners submits that he would file review applications before the Tribunal.
In view ofthe above,the writ petitions and all pending applications stand disposed of.
In case review applications are filed, the same would be disposed of by the Tribunal in accordance with law. Furthermore, if review applications are filed within two weeks, as agreed, the respondents will not raise the plea of limitation.
We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
G.S.SISTANI,J ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI,J JANUARY 28,2020 rb
W.P.
(C)385/2020etc. page2of2 2020:DHC:3927-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
28.01.2020 ^ After some hearing, counsel for the petitioners submits that the grounds raised at the time of hearing of the O.A., were not considered by Central
Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal'). Counsel submits that various judgments cited, relied upon and annexed with the O.A. are also not reflected in the
2020:DHC:3927-DB impugned order.
Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel for Government ofNCT ofDelhi
(Services),submits thatthere is no infirmity in the order passed bythe Tribunal.
She submits that the appointments would obviously have to be made as per the
Recruitment Rules ofthe year 2014 when the vacancies were notified and the advertisement was published; and subsequent directions issued by the Central
Governmenton 07.01.2016 cannotbe applied.
Atthis stage,counsel for the petitioners submits that he would file review applications before the Tribunal.
In view ofthe above,the writ petitions and all pending applications stand disposed of.
In case review applications are filed, the same would be disposed of by the Tribunal in accordance with law. Furthermore, if review applications are filed within two weeks, as agreed, the respondents will not raise the plea of limitation.
We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
G.S.SISTANI,J ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI,J JANUARY 28,2020 rb
W.P.
(C)385/2020etc. page2of2 2020:DHC:3927-DB
JUDGMENT