Palash Agarwal v. State & Anr

Delhi High Court · 15 Jan 2020 · 2020:DHC:247
Suresh Kumar Kait
CRL.M.C. 4303/2017
2020:DHC:247
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4303/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 15.01.2020
CRL.M.C. 4303/2017 with CRL.M.A. 17974/2017
PALASH AGARWAL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Siddharth Bhatti and Mr. Harsh K., Advs.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with SI Arvind Kumar, PS – Anand
Vihar Advocate (appearance not given) for R-2 with R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No. 410/2017 dated 23.08.2017 registered at Police Station – Anand Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. 2020:DHC:247

4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

6. Respondent no. 2 is personally present in Court with her counsel. For her identification, she has shown her PAN Card. Original of her PAN Card bearing No. BWVPA7389C is seen and returned. She submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 21.11.2016. A cheque bearing NO. 670578 dated 15.01.2020 drawn on Canara Bank, Delhi Bhogal Lane Branch, New Delhi for an amount of ₹5 lakhs has been handed over to the respondent no. 2 today in the Court. It is made clear that if the aforesaid cheque is not clear, the petitioner shall be liable to pay an amount of ₹50,000/- in favour of respondent no. 2.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present petition may be allowed.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 410/2017 dated 23.08.2017 registered at Police Station – Anand Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed of. Dasti.

JUDGE JANUARY 15, 2020 PB