Bachitter Singh v. State

Delhi High Court · 31 Jan 2020 · 2020:DHC:707
Suresh Kumar Kait
CRL.A.1662/2014
2020:DHC:707
criminal sentence_modified

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court modified the sentence of an appellant convicted under the NDPS Act to account for the period already served including default imprisonment for non-payment of fine and directed his immediate release while maintaining the conviction.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.A.1662 /2014
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 31.01.2020
CRL.A. 1662/2014
BACHITTER SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through Mr.Chetan Lokur, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through Ms.Pooja Bhaskar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. The present appeal is filed under section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 19.07.2014 and 23.07.2014 respectively passed by learned ASJ, NDPS Act, Delhi in case SC No.16A/10 pertaining to Unique case ID No.02403R023332010 under section 21/25/29 NDPS Act.

2. Vide order on sentence, he has been convicted and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years and fine of Rs.[1] lakh for the offence punishable under section 21(c) of the NDPS Act and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 3 months.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the nominal roll 2020:DHC:707 dated 18.01.2020, the appellant has already undergone 9 years 11 months 25 days in judicial custody, thus, as on date, he has completed 10 years and 10 days.

4. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the conviction order, however, submits that the order on sentence be modified on the sentence of 10 days already undergone in default of payment of fine of Rs.[1] lakh.

5. Keeping in view the fact that the appellant belongs to a very poor strata of the society and his appeal is filed through legal aid, therefore, I hereby modify order dated 23.07.2014 to the extent that he has to undergo 10 days imprisonment in default of fine amount.

6. Accordingly, jail authorities are directed to release the appellant forthwith, since he has completed 10 days in default of fine, if not required in any other case.

7. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of qua appellant no.2 while maintaining conviction order dated 19.07.2014. Crl.M.A. 2313/2020

8. In view of order passed in Crl.A.1662/2014, the application has been rendered infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.

9. Copy of this order be transmitted to the Jail Superintendent for information and compliance.

JUDGE JANUARY 31, 2020 ab