Sanjay Suri v. State

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2020 · 2020:DHC:158
Brijesh Sethi
W.P.(Crl.) 60/2020
2020:DHC:158
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC subject to compliance conditions.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(Crl.) 60/2020 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: January 10, 2020
W.P.(CRL) 60/2020 and CRL.M.A. 347/2020
SANJAY SURI & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through Ms. Vandana Anand, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person
VERSUS
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Mr. Amanpreet Singh and Mr. Divyank Tyagi, Advocates for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for the State with SI Manoj Kumar, P.S.: Patel Nagar
Mr. Saket Gakhar, Advocate for Respondent nos. 2 and 3 alongwith respondent nos. 2 and 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
JUDGMENT
BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral)
The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.
2020:DHC:158 0492/2016, under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at P.S.: Patel Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
The petitioners and respondent nos.2 and 3 submitted that they have settled their disputes vide Memorandum of
Understanding/Settlement dated 11.01.2018, on their own free will, without any force or coercion. Respondent nos.2 and 3 stated that they do not want to pursue the matter.
Respondent nos.2 and 3, who are present in Court, have reiterated the aforesaid facts and submitted that they have amicably settled their dispute. Respondent nos.2 and 3 further submitted that they have no objection to the FIR being quashed and the petition being allowed.
The Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent nos.2 and 3.
In view of the above settlement arrived at between the parties, this
Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 0492/2016, under section 420 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Patel Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to providing 25 saplings of Areca palm 3 to 4 feet in height having 4 to 5 suckers in 10” Earthen pot, 50 saplings of
Money plant height 1 to 1.5 feet with moss stick in 10” Earthen pot, 50 saplings of Oxycodium plant height 1 to 1.5 feet with moss stick in
10”earthen pot and 50 saplings of Raphis Palm height 1 to 1.5 feet with moss stick in 10” Earthen pot, by the petitioners with the Dy. Director
(Horticulture), NDMC Purana Quila Road Timber Nursery near Indian
Coast Guard Headquarters, Major Dhyan Chand Stadium, Gate No. 7.
Parties are directed to file compliance report within a period of four weeks before the Registrar General, failing which the petitioner will pay a cost of Rs. 25,000/- which shall be deposited with the Delhi High Court
Staff Welfare Fund.
Petition alongwith pending application is disposed of accordingly.
(BRIJESH SETHI)
JUDGE
JANUARY 10, 2020 savita