Sukhjinder Singh Saini v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 25 Feb 2020 · 2020:DHC:1340
C. Hari Shankar
Crl.M.C. 1032/2020
2020:DHC:1340
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court reiterated its earlier direction for expeditious disposal of domestic violence proceedings, declining to order day-to-day hearings due to trial court workload.

Full Text
Translation output
Crl.M.C. 1032/2020 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 25th February, 2020
CRL.M.C. 1032/2020
SUKHJINDER SINGH SAINI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Roopenshu Pratap Singh and Mr. Vikram Singh, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL)
25.02.2020 Crl.M.A.No.4137/2020 (exemption)
JUDGMENT

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. No. 1032/2020

1. This petition seeks day-to-day conducting of the criminal proceedings, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court-1, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CC No. 106/6/2014 (Harvinder Kaur vs. Sukhjinder Singh Saini).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to the order dated 10th November, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in Crl. Revision Petition 494/2015, in which after recording the facts and details, the learned Single Judge directed the learned Metropolitan Magistrate to dispose of the application, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women 2020:DHC:1340 Crl.M.C. 1032/2020 from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 as soon as possible and preferably within a period of six months from the date of the judgment.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that despite a lapse of more than two years from the said judgment, the proceedings still remain pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.

4. It is not possible for this Court, keeping in view the quantum of work before the learned trial court, to direct day-to-day hearing; this Court, however, reiterates the direction, contained in the order dated 10th November, 2017, to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, to dispose of the proceedings expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months.

5. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.