Trushtima Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2025 · 2025:DHC:9089-DB
Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain
W.P.(CRL) 3321/2025
2025:DHC:9089-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition after the alleged detainee appeared in person and denied illegal detention, holding no further relief was warranted.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(CRL) 3321/2025 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 10th October, 2025
W.P.(CRL) 3321/2025 & CRL.M.A. 30195/2025
TRUSHTIMA SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dileep Kumar Mishra
WITH
Mr. Mahendra Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, St. Counsel (Crl.)
WITH
Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Aryam Sachdeva and Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Advocate
WITH
Inspr. Ajeet Kumar, PS
Sagar Pur.
Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 B.N.S.S., 2023 and petitioner, inter alia, seeks directions in the nature of Habeas Corpus seeking directions to the respondent for production of Sh. Laxmi Narayan Jilowa (petitioner’s father).

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner’s father, aged about 61 years, left for his native place at Swami Sehi Village, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan on 20.08.2025 and has been missing since then. W.P.(CRL) 3321/2025 2

3. Today, Sh. Laxmi Narayan Jilowa, missing father of the petitioner has appeared in person in the court. He submits that he was not illegally detained by anyone.

4. Since Sh. Laxmi Narayan Jilowa is in his sixties and is free to live wherever he pleases, therefore, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition and the petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

(VIVEK CHAUDHARY) JUDGE (MANOJ JAIN)

JUDGE OCTOBER 10, 2025/st/pb