Rajkumar v. Commissioner of Police

Delhi High Court · 25 Feb 2020 · 2020:DHC:3834-DB
G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani
W.P.(C)-1424/2020
2020:DHC:3834-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of compassionate allowance on the ground that it constituted a fresh cause of action to be challenged separately.

Full Text
Translation output
$-3 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(C)-1424/2020 EX.CT.(DVR.)RAJKUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr.Somvir Singh Deswal,Advocate
VERSUS
COMMISSIONEROFPOLICE AND ORS. Respondents Thi'ough: Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat,Standing Counsel, GNCTD(services)with Mr.N.K.Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
25.02.2020 C.M.Nos.4956-4957/2020(exemption)
Exemptions allowed,subjecttojust exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(CI 1424/2020 and C.M.4955/2020(stavl
A writ petition filed earlier assailing order dated 10.08.2018 ofthe Central
Administrative Tribunal('Tribunal')in O.A.No. 1407/2015 was allowed in part by this Court by order dated 20.05.2019, whereby the Division Bench of this
Court had directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for compassionate allowance under Rule 41 ofthe CCS(Pension)Rules, 1972 ifhe were to make an application. An application having been made,stands rejected by respondents' order dated 07.10.2019; which has led to the filing of the present petition.
After some hearing in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner
2020:DHC:3834-DB submits that since rejection of the application is a fresh cause of action, he would assail the same in accordance with law.
The petition and C.M.4955/2020 are accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Copy ofthis order be given dasti,as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI,J OU ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI,J FEBRUARY 25,2020 rb
W.P.(C)1424/2020 page2of2
2020:DHC:3834-DB
JUDGMENT