IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. v. India Bulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 2020:DHC:1853-DB
Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh
LPA 1
2020:DHC:1853-DB
civil appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal by IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd. against Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., disposing it in terms of an earlier judgment to prevent re-litigation of settled issues.

Full Text
Translation output
L
P
A1
JUDGMENT

0 P a g e 1o f I NT H EH I G HC O U R TO FD E L H I A TN E WD E L H I J u d g me n t D e l i v e r e dO n:.. L P A[1], C MA P P L. N o. 0( S t a y ) I D B I T R U S T E E S H I PS E R V I C E SL T D. A p p e l l a n t v e r s u s I N D I A B U L L SH O U S I N GF I N A N C EL T D. &O R S.. R e s p o n d e n t s A d v o c a t e s w h oa p p e a r e di nt h i s c a s e: F o r t h e A p p e l l a n t: Mr. A b h i s h e k B a i d, A d v o c a t e F o r t h e R e s p o n d e n t s: Mr. H a r i s hS a l v e, S e n i o rA d v o c a t ew i t hMr. R a j i vN a y a r, S e n i o rA d v o c a t ew i t hMr.K a r a n L u t h r a, Mr. R i s h i A g r a w a l a, Mr. A n k i t B a n a t i a n d Mr. K a r t i k N a y a r A d v o c a t e s f o r R -. Mr.T u s h a rMe h t a, S o l i c i t o rG e n e r a lo fI n d i a w i t hMr. N e e r a j Ma l h o t r a, S e n i o r A d v o c a t e, Mr. A s h i s hA g g a r w a l, A d v o c a t e, Mr.D. V.S e k h a r, C G MS E B I f o r R -. C O R A M: H O N ’ B L EMR. J U S T I C ES I D D H A R T HMR I D U L H O N ’ B L EMR. J U S T I C ET A L WA N TS I N G H J U D G ME N T S I D D H A R T H MR I D U L, J. ( O P E N C O U R T – V I D E O C O N F E R E N C I N G ). T h ep r e s e n t ma t t e r h a sb e e nt a k e nu pf o r h e a r i n gb y w a y o f V i d e oC o n f e r e n c i n go na c c o u n t o f l o c k d o w nd u e t oC O V I D -.. T h e p r e s e n ta p p e a li s d i s p o s e d o f,i n t e r ms o ft h e j u d g me n tp a s s e di nL P A 1 0t i t l e da s“ I C I C IL o mb a r d 2020:DHC:1853-DB L P A[1]

0 P a g e 2o f G e n e r a l I n s u r a n c eC o mp a n y L t d. v s. I n d i a b u l l sH o u s i n gF i n a n c e L t d. &O r s. ” o f t h ee v e nd a t e.P e n d i n ga p p l i c a t i o na l s os t a n d s d i s p o s e do f.. F o r d e t a i l e d J u d g me n t,s e e L P A 1,d a t e d.... A c o p yo ft h i so r d e rb ep r o v i d e d t o l e a r n e d c o u n s e l a p p e a r i n go nb e h a l f o f t h ep a r t i e se l e c t r o n i c a l l y.Ac o p y o f t h i s o r d e r b e u p l o a d e do nt h e w e b s i t e o f t h i s C o u r t f o r t h w i t h. S I D D H A R T HMR I D U L ( J U D G E ) T A L WA N TS I N G H ( J U D G E ) MA Y0, a s