Asha Kiran v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr

Delhi High Court · 11 Mar 2020 · 2020:DHC:3940
Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C)2723/2020
2020:DHC:3940
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw writ petitions challenging an eviction notice issued by the Appellate Tribunal under PMLA, reserving all rights for fresh proceedings after the Presiding Officer resumed sittings.

Full Text
Translation output
$—88 to 90
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)2723/2020&CM APPL.9479-9480/2020
ASHA KIRAN Petitioner
Through Mr. Sachin Midha and Mr. Rajiv Dviwedi,Advocates
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR Respondents
Through None.
W.P.(C)2724/2020&CM APPL.9481-9482/2020
AAA INFOSYSTEM PRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT AND ANR Respondents
W.P.(C)2725/2020&CM APPL.9483-9484/2020
RAMESH C.BAWA Petitioner
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE OFENFORCEMENT AND ANR Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER o/o 11.03.2020 P320 1
W.P.(C)2723/2020&other connected matters
2020:DHC:3940 /- Petitioner had sought to impugn eviction notice dated
27.02.2020 on the ground that Appellate Tribunal for Prevention of
Money Laundering Act,2002 was not in session because the learned
Presiding Officer was unwell.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently learned Presiding Officer has resumed the sittings and accordingly he seeks leave to withdraw the petitions reserving their rights to move afresh before the appropriate authority.
The petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.Allrights and contentions ofthe parties are reserved.
OrderDasti under signatures ofCourt Master.
<u—^ f-'•—
IV SACHDEVA,J MARCH 11,2020 U JCh^Li VJEEV
W.P.(C)2723/2020& other connected matters Page 2
2020:DHC:3940
JUDGMENT