Shayda Abbasi v. Union of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · 13 Mar 2020 · 2020:DHC:3944-DB
Siddharth Mridul; Talwant Singh
W.P.(C)1946/2020
2020:DHC:3944-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice as premature, directing the petitioner to await the disciplinary authority's final order before seeking judicial intervention.

Full Text
Translation output
$-4
; ™ high courtofhflhiatnew DEEHI
W.P.(C)1946/2020
SHAYDA ABBASI
P
Through;
VERSUS
UNION OFINDIA & ORS
Through: etitioner
Mr.Suresh Sharma,Advocate.
Respondents
Mr. Sanjeey Sabharwal, Senior Govt.
Counsel for UOI with Mr. flem
Kumar, Advocate along with Mr. R.
Ranganath Rao, Section Officer
CAO/AMTB)forR-lto3.
CORAM:
HON'BIE MR.JUSTICESIDDHARTH MRIDUL
HGN'BLE MR.JUSTICE TALWANTSINGH
% 13.03.2020
Learned counsel appearing on behalf ofthe petitioner states that in terms ofthe direction issued bythe Central Administrative Tribunal vide the impugned order dated 27.11.2019, she is in reeeipt ofa show-cause notice dated 24.01:2020 from Mr. Susheel Kumar Sharma, SAO, CAO/A-1 and furthei that the petitioner has filed her reply to the said show-cause notice yesterday.
In view ofthe foregoing,learned counsel appearing on behalfofthe petitioner does not press this petition any further at this stage whilst reserving liberty to approaeh the tribunal afresh ifsome grievanee remains after the Disciplinary Authority passes detailed speaking order in relation to
2020:DHC:3944-DB
I the subject show-cause notice and the petitioner's reply to that.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed and disposed of, granting leave and liberty as prayed.
MARCH 13,2020 ssc
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL,J
TALWANT SINGH,J
2020:DHC:3944-DB
JUDGMENT