Yash Aggarwal & Another v. Union of India & Others

Delhi High Court · 17 Apr 2020 · 2020:DHC:1797-DB
J.R. Midha; Jyoti Singh
W.P.(C) 2969/2020
2020:DHC:1798-DB
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in its judgment to accurately reflect the intended language, emphasizing the court's power to amend clerical mistakes.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2969/2020
YASH AGGARWAL & ANOTHER ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Sumedh Rishi, Advocate along with petitioners in person (through
VC).
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Standing Counsel for respondent no.1.
Mr. Satyakam, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. T. Singhdev, Standing Counsel along with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate for respondent no.3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R 17.04.2020
JUDGMENT

1. Judgment in the above-mentioned case has been delivered by this Court today i.e. 17.04.2020. It has come to our notice that a typographical error has occurred in the first line of paragraph 26 of the judgment and the same is hereby corrected. The word „it‟ be read as „he/she‟.

2. First sentence of paragraph 26 of the judgment would read as under: “Needless to state that if any citizen has any grievance, he/she can approach the competent Authorities in the 2020:DHC:1798-DB Government, to seek appropriate redressal through the helplines and dedicated Whatsapp numbers.”

3. This order will be read as part of the judgment dated 17.04.2020.

4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsels for parties through email. J.R. MIDHA, J. JYOTI SINGH, J. APRIL 17, 2020 srb