Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 22nd July, 2020
SHASHANK S. MANGAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Harsh Dhankar, Mr. Shashank S.
Mangal and Mr. Aman Inani, Advocates.
Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R-1 & 2/GNCTD with Dr. Rajender Dhar, Addl. Secretary, Labour Department, GNCTD.
Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rohan Anand and Mr. Waize Ali
Noor, Advocates for R-3/UOI with Mr. Surendra Patel, Deputy Secretary, MoL&E, Mr. Shashi Negi, Chief
Labour Commissioner (Central), Mr. Ajey Tewari, Joint Secretary, DGLW and Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Director.
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done by video conferencing.
2. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed seeking implementation of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 (hereinafter, “Migrant Workers Act”) in Delhi. Notice was issued in the 2020:DHC:2343 petition on 2nd June, 2020. After setting out the scheme of the Act, the following information was called for from the Union of India and the Delhi Government:
3. Thereafter, on 29th June, 2020 the UOI filed a report/note, which gave some information.
GNCTD also filed a status report giving various facts. After perusing the said reports, this Court had directed as under:
4. Pursuant to the last order, the UOI has filed a detailed affidavit, deposed and signed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi. Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, Director under instructions from Mr. Surendra Patel, Deputy Secretary, MoL&E, Mr. Shashi Negi, Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Mr. Ajey Tewari, Joint Secretary & DGLW have joined the proceedings. On behalf of the GNCTD Dr. Rajender Dhar, Addl. Secretary, Labour Department, has joined the proceedings today through video conferencing.
5. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI has taken this Court through the affidavit filed by the UOI, specifically in respect of the portal which is now being created. He submits that the Government of India has taken steps for creation of a National Database for Unorganized Workers (hereinafter, “NDUW”). The concept note of the said database has also been placed on record. Ld. counsel further submits that insofar as this database is concerned, the same is being monitored by the Supreme Court in SLP (Crl) 150/2012 titled Shramjeevi Mahila Samiti v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
6. It is submitted by Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta that the NDUW has been approved. The budget is being prepared and the same has to be confirmed/approved by the EFC, Ministry of Finance. Upon approval, steps will be taken to create the database within 6 months.
7. Dr. Rajender Dhar has highlighted the various steps taken by the Delhi Government for registration of Migrant Workers as of January, 2020. It is submitted that during the lockdown, a Special Nodal Officer was designated to entertain complaints from Migrant Workers. It is further submitted that more than 710 complaints were received from the Migrant Workers in respect of non-payment of wages, out of which 85% have been resolved after Government intervention. Insofar as termination of the Migrant Workers is concerned, assistance was provided to workers free of cost and a `Shramik’ helpline was also created for this purpose. It is further submitted that Rs.10,000/- has been disbursed to more than 36,000 Migrant Workers, who have availed of the various schemes of the Delhi Government.
8. Mr. Ramesh Singh, ld. ASC submits that insofar as the Migrant Workers Act is concerned, the same envisages Migrant Workers belonging to one state being deputed by contractors from another state. Ld. counsel submits that this requirement needs to be re-examined owing to the nature of Migrant Workers in the unorganized sector.
9. Ld. counsel for the Petitioner submits that there is another enactment that deals with unorganized workers who are not engaged by contractors i.e., the Unorganized Workers Social Security Act, 2008. Ld. counsel submits that various state governments, including the Delhi Government, have not even framed Rules under this Act.
10. This Court has heard ld. counsels for the parties and perused the status reports filed by the UOI and the GNCTD. Firstly, since the NDUW is now under works, the said database should be created expeditiously. The features of the NDUW as per the `Concept Note’ are:
1) Creation of National Database for Unorganised Workers seeded with Aadhaar.
2) Integration of PM-SYM, NPS Traders Pensions Schemes and other schemes being implemented by the Central Govt. for Unorganised workers.
3) Sharing of information with various stakeholders through APIs.
4) Mobile App for registration (Shramik Setu App)
5) Access of pension account by beneficiaries through login and password.
6) Exit Module of the schemes
7) Grievances Module
8) Call Centers (integrated with Grievances Module)
9) Feedback for the users (Public and Registered) on the Portal
10) Any other functions as decided by the Ministry The creation of a portal with the above features would bring all unorganised and migrant labour under a single umbrella so that benefits which are meant for them can suitably be provided and in case of any crisis, details are available with the authorities. Insofar as the provisions of the Migrant Workers Act are concerned, since the same envisages recruitment of workers through contractors and the said Act would have no application otherwise the same requires a relook. The Government of India shall consider if any provisions of the said Act should be amended for the welfare of unorganized workers who are not engaged by a contractor.
11. Since the creation of a database is presently being supervised by the Supreme Court, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. Taking on record the status reports, affidavits and the statements made by the respective officers of UOI and GNCTD and binding them to the same, the present petition is disposed of. All pending applications are also disposed of. If the Petitioner has any outstanding grievances, the Petitioner’s rights and remedies in respect of the same are left open.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE JULY 22, 2020/dk/T