Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 6427/2020
Date of Decision: 16th September, 2020 DARGAH E ISLAMIA INTEZAMIA COMMITTEE
THROUGH: ITS GENERAL SECRETARY ..... Petitioner
Through: Rasheed Abdus Sattar Qureshi, Adv.
Through: Mr.Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Adv. for GNCT Delhi for R-1.
Mr.Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel for R-2,3&4.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
JUDGMENT
Proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
1. This so-called public interest litigation has been preferred for the following prayers:-
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner has raised allegations about the illegal construction and illegal actions taken by respondent No.3/North Delhi Municipal Corporation.
3. The illegality or otherwise of the construction cannot be decided in this writ petition. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any illegality or violation on the materials placed on record. There are only vague allegations about encroachment of land, illegal construction and the existence of a high tension electricity line on the land adjoining the petitioner’s property. The illegality of the construction can be established only by cogent and convincing evidences to be led before the concerned Court.
4. We are, therefore, not inclined to issue any writ, order or direction upon the respondents.
5. Liberty, however, is reserved with the petitioner to prefer a representation before the concerned respondent authorities. As and when such a representation is filed, the concerned respondent authorities shall decide the grievances ventilated in the representation in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policies applicable to the facts of the case, after giving adequate opportunity of being heard to the concerned parties.
6. With these observations, this writ petition is dismissed.
CHIEF JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 ‘anb’