NEW OM CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNION OF INDIA

Delhi High Court · 03 Sep 2020 · 2020:DHC:2698
C. Hari Shankar
OMP (T) (COMM.) 29/2020
2020:DHC:2698
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 after the original arbitrator superannuated, allowing proceedings to continue from final arguments.

Full Text
Translation output
OMP (T) (COMM.) 29/2020
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
O.M.P.(T) (COMM.) 29/2020
NEW OM CONSTRUCTION CO. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA .... Respondent
Through: Mr. Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, Adv. Sr.Panel Counsel
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C .HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL)
03.09.2020 (video-conferencing)
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 29/2020
JUDGMENT

1. This petition has been preferred under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, for appointment of a substitute arbitrator, as Mr. K.K. Gupta, the learned Sole Arbitrator who had been appointed to adjudicate on the disputes between the parties, had superannuated without passing of award in the matter.

2. Reply and rejoinder had been filed. In the rejoinder, the petitioner has submitted that he has no objection to the appointment of Mr. S.S. Bansal, Additional Director (General) of the respondent, as the substitute arbitrator in place of Mr. K.K. Gupta, and as suggested vide the letter dated 28th August, 2020 of the respondent. 2020:DHC:2698 OMP (T) (COMM.) 29/2020

3. Mr. Ankit Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view thereof, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition which may be disposed of accordingly.

4. In these circumstances, Mr. S.S. Bansal, Additional Director (General) of the respondent department, is appointed, by consent, as substitute arbitrator, in place of Mr. K.K. Gupta, who was conducting the arbitral proceedings thus far.

5. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem that, while Mr Bansal would not be required to re-record the evidence already recorded, final arguments in the matter may be addressed before him de novo.

6. Accordingly, Mr. Bansal would take over the proceedings from the stage of hearing of final arguments, whereafter he would proceed to pass the award in the matter.

7. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

SEPTEMBER 03, 2020