Full Text
V
(47 (48 (49 (50 (51 (52 (53 (55 (56 (57 (58 (59
(62 (63 (71 (72 (73 (74 (75 (76 (77 (78 (79
W.P.(C)9944/2020i& CM Nos.31640-41/2020 W.P.(C)9946/2020i& CM Nos.31646-47/2020
W.P,(C)9947/2020&CM Nos.31648-49/2020
SITI NETWORKSLIMITED Petitioner
Through Ms.RitwikaNanda,Ms.Petal Chandhok,Mr.Saurav Baveja, Mi'.Himanshu Lilani, Advs.
SRI MAMATHA cablenetwork& ANR Respondents MATHRUSHREE COMMUNICATION& ANR Respondents
2020:DHC:3890 2-? .A-.
AVEMAMACABLENETWORK&ANR. Respondents LOKESHCABLENETWORK&ANR. Respondents
SARASWATHICABLENETWORK&ANR Respondents NBETUCABLENETWORK&ANR. Respondents
SMSIGANDURCABLENETWORK&ANR Respondents SMBASAVESHWARACABLENETWORK&ANR..Respondents
SM MAHESHCABLENETWORK&ANR Respondents SRINIVASCABLENETWORK&ANR. Rrapondents
SM JALAKANTESHWARA CABLENETWORK& DHANUSHCABLENETWORK Respondente
SARASWATmCA^EJTWO^^^^ PrabhakaranKhurana,Advs.(m item no.53,57,58,73,76,78).
Mr.ManikyaKhanna,Mr.Adi^a Krishna,Advs.,(in item no.51,55,5y).
HoSMR.JUSTICENAVINCHAWLA
0/^ 07.12.2020 Thishearinghasbeenheld byvideoconferencing.
, n. »'I" r""—"*■ ;
ORDER
1. - p— - •" "
1.
2. have not been listed before the learned Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal(TDSAT)in spite ofbeing mentioned for urgent listing.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits thatthese petitions seek urgent interim relief inasmuch as it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent no.l in each ofthese petitions,in spite ofhaving Interconnection Agreement(s) with the petitioner, is migrating its subscribers to the respondent no.2 withoutfollowing the Interconnection Regulations.
4. Keeping in view the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe underlying dispute between the petitioner and the respondents, the learned TDSAT is requested to list these petitions for hearing within a week of the communication of this order. The petitions shall be considered by the learned TDSAT on their own merit.
5. The petitions are disposed ofwith the above directions.There shall be no order as to cost.