Full Text
$-29 'i i ' ! I ',! to35p7,39,H2^43,-4^,U6^tb50,36and5^ '
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(37)
(39)
1(42)
(43)
(44)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(56)
(57)
W.I^.(G)963^020:&Ck Nos.30865-66/2020
9634/202014■ek Nos3
W.Fj.(C) 9635/2020|& Ck Nos.30860-70/2020 W.I].(C) 9636/2020^ CM Nos.30871 72/2020
W.I^.(C) 9637/2020^ CM Nos.30873-k/2020 W.I^.(C) 9640/2020 CM Nos.30876-i77/2020
W.I^.(C) 9641/2020 <fciCM N6sJ30878-79/2020
^•^•(C) 9643/2020 & CM Nos.30880-81/2020
W.I^.(C) 9656/2020 i& Ck Nos.30923-24/2020
W.I^.(C) 9667/2020ijj& N6s.30947-48/2020 W.I^.(C) 9670/2020;!& Ck NQs.30954-5^^
W.^.(C) 9676/2020 |; pk Nos.30964-65/2020 W.I|.(C) 9679/2020^ pk Nos.30972-7^2020
968O/2O20 4p dk Nos.30976-77/2020 W.^.(p) 9087/2020 ^ CM Nos.30992-93/2020
W-S-fPl ^089/202fi hp 1 i i |' , . i is'-iJi i'oiO
CM Nps.30995-96/2020 l.'l Petitioner ' iiilh'' i'h'i 'pis hl|lrtiu^;;| Adv.
!f ij ii '■ I 'lh' '' iSLffic U/VtJJbJti ?iN£. 1{ YV tJK ililliiO
■ i '■ [
S.S;[C6kllpNI0!M ■ , su]teiteT;i|||iRi i^irw^Rk:(& C:
NALAkANI^ENTE#RISEs!i^ t'' Respondents & ANR.
Respondent
•111': I
Pi' I ' i ! i ' 1 ' I"
IE. ' ]L '■ ]
■ i i, ' - V .ij
]'■ ii n'
2020:DHC:3888 OTLLARGAiLEifefFWORR&aM.'^ Resnondents fanr:;::..
SRfeHAiiKlk^ JJ.GA^LENETWOW &Am/ ^ ^ / r - espondents
SRILAXMlVElSf^ CABLENETWORK&ANR^^^^
I ■ : ^ i;'
| , ''J; I; Respondents S^,MALIGE;SHWAiRICABLES&ANR. Resnondent.
MANJUCABLEWWORK&ANR. , Resp^Ss ' . :.!:.. 1; j]\E:.]Ndtikul Sharma,Ms.Vidya
[ I ; ! .: .; P^^-bhakaranTChiirana,Advs.(initem
■■ 1 no.48&50)'
!""! i" i t i; lA.,' 1.
2.
HOlfl/pLE MB;J^^TIGE^
■ -.r i ;^ Order / ■ " '
02.112.2020 This The hearing hastifeeh heldjby video conferencing. i ■■ . i - !' 'i i'.'p J priniaiy ,grievhn|CQ:;Qf, the petitioner in the present batch of petitions is that the!petitil):hs haj/ihg been fileti on 05.10.2020/06.11.2020, eeriTisted before the dear^ Telecom/Disputes Settlement and have not b
Appellate ribunal(T]^SAT)iipiSpi;te dfbeing pientioned for urgentlisting.
JUDGMENT
3. Thelearned couriselforthe petitioner submits thatthese petitions seek i J; |i '^1 !; I i'!/T '/i'-.. ■ ' ■ urgent interim belief inakmu'ch as it is the case of the petitioner that the respondent no,!in eaqh^f(hpSe petitions,in spite ofhavingInterconnection Agreement(s) with! the|ip^ljitioner,'is migrating its subscribers to the respondent n'o.[2] yithohtTollowihg the Interconnection Regulations. 1 1. j;.. r, ^ ■, ■ • i ^ ■, ifii.i' ^|h;E;' I'l '!il|;,. „( i 'J 'i'! -!;; l''!',! ' ' iii. i ■ n • 'i- ■ ■ i 'ii^: j-'.[1] i; V:i. ^ ■ I, '■ i ' i.
4. Keeping in 'He\^iit;hel si: r':i opinion on the merits 6f the nnderl I,; 1.. ■. i the responhdnts!, the! leameid 'iTDSAT is requested to list these petitions for hearing within a 'week, of the' domniunication of this order. The petitions The petitiphs iare'disposediofwith the ahove directions. There shall be no order as td cPst: !, 1; NAVIN CHAWLA, J DECEMBER 2, lOlO/Afyi ' -i! ir: r Vi-J> i- !. i" - 'it ■; i. L ■ !: v!:;: Signature ^lid NAVIl^CmWLA