Pooja Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 04 Jan 2021 · 2021:DHC:5
Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C) 5259/2020
2021:DHC:5
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking waiver of licence fee in a hostel accommodation dispute on the basis of a settlement reached through mediation.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 5259/2020
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 04.01.2021 POOJA SHARMA AND ORS ..... Petitioners
versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, ASC, GNCTD.
Ms. Shubra Mendiratta, Advocate for respondent No.3.
CORAM:-
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. In view of the settlement between the parties and for the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Impleadment is allowed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. CM APPL.21666/2020 (for impleadment)

2. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. W.P.(C) 5259/2020 & CM APPL.18949/2020 (stay), CM APPL.21665/2020 (filed on behalf of petitioner seeking directions) 2021:DHC:5

3. Petitioners in this petition had sought recall/suspension/waiver of the licence fee sought to be charged by respondent No.3 from the petitioners, who are inmates of the hostel facilities provided by the respondent No.3 at the All India Women Conference at 6, Bhagwan Das, Road, New Delhi.

4. It was contended by the petitioners that full licence fee and mess charges could not be charged by the respondent No.3 in view of the fact that petitioners had to leave the accommodation in view of the lockdown and pandemic.

5. Parties were referred to mediation. Parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation and entered into the Settlement Agreement, though undated, but signed by the mediator on 23.10.2020 after being confirmed by the parties by their respective emails dated 22.10.2020. The Settlement Agreement is taken on record.

6. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3 that in terms of the settlement all agreed amounts have been paid by the petitioners and accordingly now there are no claims against the petitioners.

7. Learned counsels for the parties submit that all disputes between the parties have been fully and finally resolved and accordingly, no disputes are now surviving.

8. The petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement.

9. In view of the settlement between the petitioners and respondent No. 3, the issue of maintainability of the petition is left open.

10. Copy of the judgment be uploaded on the High Court website and be forwarded to the Learned counsels by the Court Master through email.

JANUARY 04, 2021 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J st