ASI/GD Mahesh Chandra v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Feb 2021 · 2021:DHC:489-DB
Manmohan; Asha Menon
W.P. (C) 1718/2021
2021:DHC:489-DB
administrative petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider and grant the second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme to petitioners in accordance with binding Supreme Court and Division Bench judgments, subject to any future Supreme Court orders.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 1718/2021 & connected matters
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
21.
W.P. (C) 1718/2021 & CM APPL. 4961/2021
ASI/GD MAHESH CHANDRA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Om Prakash Agarwal, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Karan Chhibber, Advocate.
23.
W.P. (C) 1721/2021 & CM APPL. 4967/2021
ASI/GD GOPAL SINGH BISHT .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, Ms. Vinny Shangloo and Mr. Rishab Relan, Advocates.
24.
W.P. (C) 1748/2021 & CM APPL. 5056/2021
SI/GD MEGH SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
2021:DHC:489-DB 25.
W.P. (C) 1749/2021 & CM APPL. 5057/2021
ASI GD RAMESH SINGH NEGI .....Petitioner
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Vikram Jetly, Advocates.
26.
W.P. (C) 1750/2021 & CM APPL. 5058/2021
SI/GD ABBAL SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, Ms. Vinny Shangloo and Mr. Rishab Relan, Advocates.
27.
W.P. (C) 1753/2021 & CM APPL. 5062/2021
ASI GD NAND KISHOR .....Petitioner
VERSUS
UOI AND OTHER .....Respondents 28.
W.P. (C) 1754/2021 & CM APPL. 5063/2021
SI/GD LAXMAN SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
30.
W.P. (C) 1762/2021 & CM APPL. 5074/2021
SI/GD SOVAN SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocates.
31.
W.P. (C) 1771/2021 & CM APPL. 5090/2021
ASI GD JARNAIL SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate for UOI.
32.
W.P. (C) 1773/2021 & CM APPL. 5100/2021
ASI/GD VIJAY RAM .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: None.
33.
W.P. (C) 1776/2021 & CM APPL. 5107/2021
SI GD AJAYAB SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr. Jitendra Kr. Tripathi for UOI.
34.
W.P. (C) 1777/2021 & CM APPL. 5112/2021
SI GD LALITA PRASAD RATURI .....Petitioner
VERSUS
35.
W.P. (C) 1779/2021 & CM APPL. 5119/2021
ASI GD CHANDAN SINGH NEGI .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Vishal Kr. Singh, Advocate for
UOI.
36.
W.P. (C) 1784/2021 & CM APPL. 5127/2021
EX CT GD MADAN SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Anil Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kr. Dogra, Advocate.
37.
W.P. (C) 1785/2021 & CM APPL. 5128/2021
ASI GD HARDAYAL SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Ms. Bharathi Raju, Advocate with Ms. Vinny Shangloo and Mr. Rishab Relan, Advocate.
38.
W.P. (C) 1787/2021 & CM APPL. 5131/2021
ASI GD PARSHOTTAM SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
39.
W.P. (C) 1789/2021 & CM APPL. 5133/2021
ASI GD MANAB JYOTI SAIKIA .....Petitioner
VERSUS
40.
W.P. (C) 1791/2021 & CM APPL. 5136/2021
SI GD DIWAN SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate.
41.
W.P. (C) 1792/2021 & CM APPL. 5137/2021
SI GD GIRISH CHAND .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Vishal Kr. Singh, and
Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advocates 42.
W.P. (C) 1793/2021 & CM APPL. 5138/2021
EX HC GD MOHAR SINGH .....Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr. Anil Kaushik, CGSC with Mr. Amit Kr. Dogra, Advocate.
Date of Decision: 10th February, 2021
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J (Oral)

1. The petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.:

2. Present batch of petitions have been filed seeking a number of prayers. However, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that a similar order as passed by a Division Bench in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 dated 30th May, 2019 be passed in the present writ petitions. He clarifies that neither the judgment and order dated 30th

3. Issue notice. May, 2019 in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 nor the judgments referred to in the said order have been challenged before the Supreme Court by the respondents.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. Learned counsel for the respondents state that in similar matters, notices have been issued by the Supreme Court in the condonation of delay and Special Leave Petitions. They, however, candidly state that there is no stay in the said Special Leave Petitions.

5. It is pertinent to mention that the petitioners have preferred the present writ petitions to primarily seek a mandamus to the respondents to grant the benefit of the second financial upgradation under the MACP Scheme in the Pay Band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200 w.e.f. 01st January, 2006 and wherever 20 years have been completed till the date the petitioners’ voluntarily retired on 30th June, 2006 or the dates mentioned in the prayer clause along with consequential benefits including arrears. The petitioners’ claim is based upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and Ors. Vs. Balbir Singh Turn & Anr., Civil Appeal Diary No.3744/2016 along with other cases decided on 08th December, 2017. The petitioners also place reliance on the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Sunil Kumar Tyagi vs. Union of India & Anr., W.P. (C) No.3549/2018 decided on 01st

6. As admittedly there is no interim order passed by the Supreme Court in any of the Special Leave Petitions filed by the Union of India in similar matters, we dispose of the present batch of writ petitions in similar terms as passed in W.P.(C) No.6437/2019 i.e. a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners’ claim in the light of the judgments in Union of India and Ors. Vs. Balbir Singh Turn & Anr. (supra) and Sunil Kumar Tyagi vs. Union of India & Anr (supra) as well as Union of India & Ors. vs. M.V. Mohanan Nair, (2020) 5 SCC 421 and to dispose of the representations of the petitioners positively within twelve weeks from today. It is clarified that in the event the Supreme Court varies or set asides the May, 2019. order passed by the Division Bench in Sunil Kumar Tyagi vs. Union of India & Anr (supra) and/or any other similar matter, then the present order shall abide by the order(s) of the Apex Court.

7. With the aforesaid direction, the present batch of writ petitions along with pending applications stand disposed of.

8. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail. MANMOHAN, J ASHA MENON, J FEBRUARY 10, 2021 js