Piyush Shukla & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 19 Feb 2021 · 2021:DHC:616-DB
Manmohan; Asha Menon
W.P. (C) 2319/2021
2021:DHC:616-DB
administrative petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

Delhi High Court directs Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension with arrears and interest to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier pension entitlement cases.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 2319/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P. (C) 2319/2021, CM APPL. 6727/2021
PIYUSH SHUKLA & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Aditya Narayan Arya Garg, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal, Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advocates with Mr. Samir, G.P. for UOI.
Date of Decision: 19th February, 2021
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
JUDGMENT
MANMOHAN, J (Oral)

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seek the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.:

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificated (NOC) had been given. 2021:DHC:616-DB W.P. (C) 2319/2021

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment. MANMOHAN, J ASHA MENON, J FEBRUARY 19, 2021 ck