Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
AVIRAL BHATLA ….. Petitioner
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hemant Malhotra, Advocate.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel, SDMC.
1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)
2. Petitioner impugns vacation notices dated 11.02.2020, 01.02.2021 and demolition order dated 04.12.2019.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the action seems to have been taken based on some building plan dated 03.12.2010. He submits that the property has been constructed as per sanctioned plan dated 17.05.2000.
4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD which was listed 2021:DHC:680 W.P(C) 2323/2021 Page 2 on 11.03.2020 when notice was issued to the Corporation, returnable for 11.03.2020 and as none appeared for the Corporation on 11.03.2020 and the matter was adjourned to 24.03.2020 directing the Corporation to file a status report.
5. Learned counsel submits that thereafter on account of nationwide lockdown the appeal has not been taken up for hearing and today the Appellate Tribunal MCD is not functional.
6. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the owner of the lower ground floor has already filed an appeal and there is a status quo order with regard to his property by the Appellate Tribunal MCD.
7. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Corporation. Learned counsel submits that property was inspected and deviation contrary to sanction plan was found from basement upto the third floor.
8. In view of the fact that petitioner has already filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD and the appeal has not been taken up for consideration for the reasons stated afore-stated, this petition is disposed of with a direction that for a period of two weeks after the commencement of the functioning of the Appellate Tribunal MCD or till the time the appeal/stay application of the petitioner is taken up for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal MCD, whichever is earlier, no action of demolition shall be taken against the subject property.
9. The continuation of protection thereafter shall be subject to W.P(C) 2323/2021 Page 3 orders to be passed by the Appellate Tribunal MCD. It is clarified that the Appellate Tribunal MCD would be free to decide the appeal/stay application without being influenced by anything stated here in.
10. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
11. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. FEBRUARY 23, 2021 rk