Capt Sukhjit Singh Bindra v. ALM Infotech City Private Limited

Delhi High Court · 01 Mar 2021 · 2021:DHC:4428
Najmi Waziri
CONT.CAS(C)698/2020
2021:DHC:4428
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions after respondents complied with payment directions including TDS deductions and returning original documents, resolving contractual payment disputes.

Full Text
Translation output
v/ $-6,7& 16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)698/2020
CAPT SUKHJIT SINGH BINDRA Petitioner
VERSUS
ALM INFOTECH CITY PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. Respondents
CONT.CAS(C)702/2020
SH SUMEET MEFITA Petitioner
VERSUS
ALM INFOTECH CITY PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. Respondents
. CQNT.CAS(C)29/2021 DHINGRA BUILDWELL PVT.LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
ILD MILLENNIUM PVT.LTD.& ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr. Hemant Chauhan, Advocates for petitioners.
Mr. Kamail Singh, Mr. Vaibhav Mehra, Advocates alongwith Mr. Alimuddin Ahmed, Director for respondents.
Mr.Siddhant Verma,Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Digitally signed Byj^MLESH
KUMAR
Signing Datc:02.f3.2021
18:36:07 —'
2021:DHC:4428
01.03.2021 The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
ORDER

1 Thus far, the respondents have complied with the previous directions i.e. they have paid monies in terms thereof.

2 The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that TDS has not been deducted by the respondents. They suppose to do so in the last instalment.

3 Let TDS certificates be supplied to the petitioners apropos such deductions, as may be made, along with payment of the last instalment.

4 No further orders are required at this stage.

5 The petitions stand disposed-offin the above terms.

6 It will be open to the parties to approach the Court in case of difficulty.

7 The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

NAJMI WAZIRI,J MARCH 01,2021 RW Signature'Not Verified r, \ L'dB^A Digitallysigned ByjXAMLESH KUMAR Signing Datc;d[2].13.2021 18:36:07 ' $-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C)29/2021 DHINGRA BUILDWELL PVT.LTD...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Zafar Khurshid, Mr. Siddharth Agarwal and Mr.Mandavya Kapoor,Advs.

VERSUS

1. ILD MILLENNIUM PVT.LTD.& ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur,Sr. Adv.along with Mr.Karnail Singh,Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 04.07.2022 It is stated by Mr. Mohit Mathur, learned senior counsel that out of the amount ofRs.33,35,381/- payable to the petitioner, in terms ofpara-2 of the previous order,an amount ofRs.13,31,961/- stands paid. After some hearing, learned counsel for both the parties are in agreementthatthe remaining amount payable by the respondent inclusive of interest is Rs.22,63,599/-. Mr. Mohit Mathur, learned senior counsel states that the said amount shall be paid forthwith and a cheque for the said amount is being handed over to the petitioner, which can be immediately encashed by the petitioner. Thus,the grievance ofthe petitioner stands taken care of. Accordingly, petition alongwith pending applications stands disposed of. / The original documents lying with the petitioner namely the Builder Buyer Agreement and the No Objection Certificate shall be returned to the respondents forthwith. S^CHIN DATTA,J JULY 4,2022/cl