Rabindra Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 11 Nov 2025 · 2025:DHC:9969-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 13836/2023
2025:DHC:9969-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to finalize the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within six months, ensuring compliance with legal requirements, while reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the final order.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 13836/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 13836/2023
RABINDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Sonika Gill and Mr. Piyush Sharma, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, CGSC, Mr. Ali Mohammad, Asstt. Commandant, Mr. Prahlad Devenda. Insp/Exe and Mr. S K
Bharti, CISF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
11.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to finalise the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and, in case the proceedings end in the petitioner’s favour, to grant consequential reliefs.

2. It transpires that, during the pendency of this writ petition, the inquiry proceedings against the petitioner have concluded and the matter has been sent to the Ministry of Home Affairs for the disciplinary authority to take a decision on the inquiry report. W.P.(C) 13836/2023

3. Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned CGSC for the respondents, submits that the advice of the UPSC may also have to be taken and therefore prays for at least six months’ time to take a decision on the disciplinary proceedings.

4. Accordingly, we dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to positively pass a final order on the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner within a period of six months from today. Needless to say, the order would be passed after complying with the necessary requirements of law in that regard.

5. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

6. In case the petitioner continues to remain aggrieved by the order which would be ultimately passed, his rights in law shall remain reserved.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2025