Smt. Prem Ghai & Ors. v. District Magistrate North & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 27 Jul 2021 · 2021:DHC:2198
Sanjeev Sachdeva
W.P.(C) 1371/2021
2021:DHC:2198
administrative appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing reconsideration of the petitioners' application for alternative plot allotment upon furnishing documents and payment of costs, emphasizing fairness where notices were allegedly not received.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P(C) 1371/2021 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 27.07.2021
W.P.(C) 1371/2021
SMT. PREM GHAI & ORS. ….. Petitioners
versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NORTH & ANR. …..Respondents
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Dahiya, Advocate.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Respondent: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

2. Petitioner impugns order dated 28.10.2020 whereby the application of the petitioner dated 15.01.2004 for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of his land acquired in village Shahbad Daulatpur, Delhi has been rejected.

3. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up hearing today. 2021:DHC:2198 W.P(C) 1371/2021 2

4. The impugned order dated 28.10.2020 records that two notices were issued to the petitioner but petitioner failed to submit the requisite documents.

5. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner never received the said notices or became aware of any notice published in the newspaper as their predecessor-in-interest i.e. their father had expired in the year 2009.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are residents of Jalandhar, Punjab and as such were never aware of the requirement of furnishing any further documents to the respondents.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies on a judgment dated 01.10.2018 in W.P(C)11557/2017 titled Rishi Pal vs. Land & Building Department wherein in similar circumstances the matter has been remitted to the respondents to reconsider the application for allotment of an alternative plot, putting petitioner to terms for the delay in furnishing the documents.

8. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed subject to petitioner depositing costs in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with the PM Cares Fund.

9. Petitioner shall furnish the requisite documents to the respondents within a period of four weeks from today and thereafter W.P(C) 1371/2021 3 the respondents shall consider the application of the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of sixteen weeks from the furnishing of documents by the petitioner.

10. The case of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law and rules and the seniority of the petitioner.

11. Petitioners shall furnish the receipt of deposit of cost before the competent authority along with submitting his documents within four weeks.

12. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. JULY 27, 2021