BAL BHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL v. NDMC

Delhi High Court · 09 Jul 2021 · 2021:DHC:2007
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
W.P. (C) 6304/2021
2021:DHC:2007
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed the demand for differential property tax raised without a fresh assessment order and directed the respondent to pass a fresh assessment after hearing the petitioner.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 6304/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 09th July, 2021
W.P.(C) 6304/2021
BAL BHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL ..... Petitioner
versus
NDMC AND ORS ..... Respondents
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Ms. Anjan Gosain, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel with
Mr. Sunil Sabhiki, AA&C of NDMC
CORAM:-
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
CM APPLN. 19870/2021 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

1. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. W.P. (C) 6304/2021 & CM APPLN. 19869/2021 (stay)

2. Petitioner seeks quashing of letters dated 24.10.2019, 05.02.2021 and 12.03.2021 whereby the respondent-Corporation has directed the petitioner to pay the differential amount of the property tax within seven days, failing which action in accordance with law would be taken.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has 2021:DHC:2007 been regularly filing the property tax returns but was shocked to receive an assessment order dated 28.12.2018 followed by a show cause notice dated 14.01.2019. Said assessment order and show cause notice was challenged by way of a writ petition being W.P. (C) 716/2019.

4. Learned counsel submits that by order dated 22.01.2019 writ petition was allowed and respondent was directed to pass a fresh assessment order.

5. Learned counsel submits that after the order was passed, several communications were written to the respondent providing requisite documents and other details. She further submits that in terms of the amnesty Scheme, petitioner has further deposited Rs. 29 lakhs with the respondent-Corporation. She submits that to her knowledge there is no fresh assessment order passed by the respondent pursuant to the directions passed by order dated 22.01.2019 in W.P. (C) 716/2019.

6. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent.

7. Learned counsel for the respondent concedes that no fresh assessment order has been passed by the respondent pursuant to the directions issued by this Court. He further submits that the respondent shall pass a fresh assessment order as directed by this Court. He, however, prays that the petitioner be directed to appear before the Assessing Officer and furnish the requisite documents and clarification as may be required.

8. In view of the above, the demand raised in letters dated 24.10.2019, 05.02.2021 and 12.03.2021 is quashed. Petitioner/authorized representative shall appear before the Assistant Assessor and Collector, ASC Department, Rohini Zone, Delhi and produce the requisite documents in support of the assessment.

9. In case any further document/clarification is required, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner and petitioner shall thereafter furnish the same.

10. Thereafter, respondent shall pass a fresh assessment order after given an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Respondent shall communicate to the petitioner the time and date when the representative of the petitioner has to appear for the said purpose.

11. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.

12. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JULY 9, 2021 ‘rs’