Vikas Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 30 Oct 2025 · 2025:DHC:9543-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 16460/2025
2025:DHC:9543-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the competent authority to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to further legal recourse.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 16460/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 16460/2025 & CM APPL. 67328/2025
VIKAS YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Ashesh Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri and Mr. Atal Singh, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Ravi Kant Srivastava, SPC
WITH
Mr. Robert Laishram and Mr. Vinay Kaushik, GP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
30.10.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JUDGMENT

1. With the consent of Counsel, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks from today and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

2. Should the petitioner continue to remain aggrieved, his rights in law shall remain reserved.

3. The petition stands disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 30, 2025