Sunita Sharma v. State & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 13 Aug 2021 · 2021:DHC:2466
C. Hari Shankar
TEST.CAS. 47/2019
2021:DHC:2466
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw a testamentary case under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC due to health-related inability to continue proceedings, with no opposition from respondents.

Full Text
Translation output
TEST.CAS. 47/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TEST.CAS. 47/2019 & I.A. 10169/2021
SUNITA SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Karan Balraj Mehta, Adv. with petitioner in person
VERSUS
STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. T.S. Nanda, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Dhruv Chawla, Ms. Anita Kumari and
Ms. Divita Dutta, Advs. for R-2 to R-4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (ORAL)
13.08.2021 (Video-Conferencing)
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this testamentary case. I.A. 10169/2021 (under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC) in TEST.CAS. 47/2019

2. The petitioner is also present in person. Her husband, who appears on her behalf, submits that they are persons of advanced stage, and that their health has deteriorated to a point where they are not in a position to prosecute these proceedings. They, therefore, reiterate to withdraw these proceedings.

3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties does not oppose the prayer. 2021:DHC:2466 TEST.CAS. 47/2019

4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

5. The application stands allowed accordingly.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.