Full Text
Translation output
\ .
\ r^
•^V $-37,40-42,45,51,53-58
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)2584/2021
NIMIT BUILDERSPRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Ms.Kavita Jha,Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr.Anant
Mann,Advocates.
\ r^
•^V $-37,40-42,45,51,53-58
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)2584/2021
NIMIT BUILDERSPRIVATE LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Ms.Kavita Jha,Advocate with Mr.Vaibhav Kulkami and Mr.Anant
Mann,Advocates.
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX4 Respondent O Through
W.P.(C)2976/2021
ADITYA SARAF Petitioner Thi-ough: Mr.RohitJain,Advocate with
Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and Ms. Manisha Sharma,Advocates.
ADITYA SARAF Petitioner Thi-ough: Mr.RohitJain,Advocate with
Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and Ms. Manisha Sharma,Advocates.
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX4 &ANR.
Respondents
Through
Respondents
Through
W.P.(C)3004/2021
RAMESH CHANDRA SARAF Petitioner
Through: Mr.RohitJain,Advocate with
RAMESH CHANDRA SARAF Petitioner
Through: Mr.RohitJain,Advocate with
VERSUS
PR COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX4 &ANR.
2021:DHC:4480-DB
Through: Mr.RuchirBhatia,Advocate.
2021:DHC:4480-DB
Through: Mr.RuchirBhatia,Advocate.
W.P.(C)3006/2021
ASHISH SARAF Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rohit Jain,Advocate with Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and
Ms.Manisha Sharma,Advocates }
ASHISH SARAF Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rohit Jain,Advocate with Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and
Ms.Manisha Sharma,Advocates }
VERSUS
O PR COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX4& ANR.
^ Respondents
Through
^ Respondents
Through
W.P.(C)3351/2021 fflGH VALUE TRADERSPVT LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rohit Jain,Advocate with Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and
Ms.Manisha Sharma,Advocates
Through: Mr.Rohit Jain,Advocate with Mr.AniketD.Agrawal and
Ms.Manisha Sharma,Advocates
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX4&ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4032/2021
NARAYAN COMMODITYBROKERSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr.RohitJain,Advocatewith c c
NARAYAN COMMODITYBROKERSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr.RohitJain,Advocatewith c c
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX-4&ANR.
Respondent
Through
Respondent
Through
W.P.(C)4219/2021
M/SNATRAJPRODUCTSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through. Mr.Amol Sinha,Advocate with Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
M/SNATRAJPRODUCTSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through. Mr.Amol Sinha,Advocate with Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOMETAX,DELHI-4&ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4221/2021
M/S NATRAJPRODUCTSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mi*.Amol Sinha,Advocate with V Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
M/S NATRAJPRODUCTSPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mi*.Amol Sinha,Advocate with V Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,DELHI-4& ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4224/2021
M/S SKY BLUEINFOTECH PVT.LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Amol Sinha,Advocate with o Ml".Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
M/S SKY BLUEINFOTECH PVT.LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr.Amol Sinha,Advocate with o Ml".Ashvini Kumar,Advocate
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX,DBLHI-7&ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4225/2021
M/SKARAMYOGITRADINGPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr.AmolSinha,Advocate with
M/SKARAMYOGITRADINGPRIVATELIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr.AmolSinha,Advocate with
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,DELHI-4&ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4227/2021
M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADINGPVT.LTD Petitioner >'
M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADINGPVT.LTD Petitioner >'
VERSUS
C PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX,DELHI-4&ANR.
Through
Through
W.P.(C)4256/2021
M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADING PVT.LTD. Petitioner
Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate.
\ y / c
M/S NAMAH SHIVAYA TRADING PVT.LTD. Petitioner
Mr.Ashvini Kumar,Advocate.
\ y / c
VERSUS
PR.COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX,DELHI-4&ANR.
Through
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
25.08.2021 Thepetitions havebeenheard by wayofvideo conferencing.
Learned counselforthepetitioners statethatthepresent writpetitions are infiuctuous, inasmuch as, revised Form-3 have been issued to the petitionersin accordance withtheprayer clauses.
Consequently,thepresentwritpetitions are disposed ofassatisfied.
The order be uploaded on the websiteforthwith.Copy ofthe order be alsoforwardedtothelearned counselthrough e-mail.
AUGUST 25,2021 TS manMohan,j
——
NAVIN CHAWLA,J
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
25.08.2021 Thepetitions havebeenheard by wayofvideo conferencing.
Learned counselforthepetitioners statethatthepresent writpetitions are infiuctuous, inasmuch as, revised Form-3 have been issued to the petitionersin accordance withtheprayer clauses.
Consequently,thepresentwritpetitions are disposed ofassatisfied.
The order be uploaded on the websiteforthwith.Copy ofthe order be alsoforwardedtothelearned counselthrough e-mail.
AUGUST 25,2021 TS manMohan,j
——
NAVIN CHAWLA,J
JUDGMENT