Satender Jain v. Satya Narain Sanjiv Gupta HUF

Delhi High Court · 23 Sep 2021 · 2021:DHC:2801
Prathiba M. Singh
RSA 139/2019
2021:DHC:3002
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent's application to amend the judgment to correct the sequence of counsel appearances, emphasizing permissible procedural corrections.

Full Text
Translation output
RSA 139/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RSA 139/2019 & CM APPLs. 33345-46/2021
SATENDER JAIN ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Varun Goswami and Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocates.
VERSUS
SATYA NARAIN SANJIV GUPTA HUF ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan and Mr. Ankur Mahindro, Advocates.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R 23.09.2021
JUDGMENT

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing. CM APPL. 33346/2021 (for exemption)

2. Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 33345/2021 ( for seeking amendment)

3. This is an application filed on behalf of the Respondent seeking amendment of the Judgment dated 9th September, 2021 to the extent of correcting the sequence of appearances as entered in respect of the ld. Counsels for the Respondent.

4. Let the appearance be changed as follows- + RSA 139/2019 SATENDER JAIN..... Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta and Ms. Surbhi Gupta, Advocates (M: 9899950712).

VERSUS

2021:DHC:3002 RSA 139/2019 SATYA NARAIN SANJIV GUPTA HUF..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan and Mr. Ankur Mahindro, Advocates. (M-9891051888)

5. Let this order be uploaded as corrigendum to Judgment dated 9th September, 2021.

6. Application is disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 MR/AD