M/S PNC-TRG (JV) v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Delhi High Court · 17 Nov 2021 · 2021:DHC:3705
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 168/2021
2021:DHC:3705
arbitration petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal under Sections 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the death of the Presiding Arbitrator.

Full Text
Translation output
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 168/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 17.11.2021
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 168/2021
M/S PNC-TRG (JV) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dharmender Rautray & Ms.Tara Shahani, Advocates
VERSUS
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
JUDGMENT
(oral)
IA No. 15014/2021 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

3. The present petition under Sections 29 A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed seeking extension of mandate of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating the disputes between the parties.

4. Pertinently, Petitioner, PNC-TRG (JV), a Joint Venture between M/s. PNC Infratech Ltd. (formerly known as M/S PNC Construction Co. Ltd) and respondent- National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) with regard to 2021:DHC:3705 certain disputes arising out of a contract dated 19.9.2007, for the work of four laning of Km 51.00 to Km. 61.00 (including Chambal Bridge) on Dholpur-Morena Section of NH-3 on North-South corridor in the States of Rajasthan / Madhya Pradesh (Contract package No. NS-1/RJ-MP/1), had entered into an arbitration. The Arbitral Tribunal was held on 24.10.2018 (with Corrigendum dated 26.10.2018).

5. As per averments made in Para-5(xviii) till (xx), the reasons for delay in arbitral proceedings due to Covid pandemic have been cited. Further in Para-5 (xxi) it is further averred that after demise Mr. J.C. Shah, Presiding Arbitrator, in July, 2020, Mr. S.C. Gupta, former General Manager NTPC was appointed as the Substitute Presiding Arbitrator and the Arbitral Tribunal further proceeded in the matter.

6. At the hearing, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that total 47 meetings have taken place before the Arbitral Tribunal, however, prolongation of proceedings is beyond the control and therefore, prays that the mandate of Arbitral Tribunal be extended till 28.2.2022.

7. Notice issued.

8. Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent, accepts notice and submits that there is no objection if the time for making the award is extended.

9. In view of the aforesaid, the mandate and time of the Arbitral Tribunal for conclusion of proceedings, preparing and pronouncing the Award is extended upto 28.02.2022.

10. With aforesaid directions, the present petition is accordingly disposed of.

JUDGE NOVEMBER 17, 2021 r