Vandana Sodhi v. State of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 06 Jan 2022 · 2022:DHC:5953
Rajnish Bhatnagar
BAIL APPLN.211/2021
2022:DHC:5953
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications as infructuous after the prosecution filed a closure report in the connected matter, removing any apprehension of arrest.

Full Text
Translation output
/ (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)
$-16 & 17 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.211/2021
VANDANA SODHI Petitioner
Through: Mr.Anil K Aggarwal,and Mr. Vivek Nasa,Advocates.
O
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT OF SWLHI Respondent
Through: Mr.Amit Ahlawat,APP for the State.
BAIL APPLN.212/2021
SANDEEP SUMBLY
Through:
Petitioner Mr.Anil K Aggarwal,and Mr. Vivek Nasa,Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT OF DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr.Amit Ahlawat,APP for the State.
O
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
06.01.2022 These petitions are filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR no. 83/2020 registered under section
419/420/506/511/120B IPG and section 66(D) of IT Act, 2000 at police station Tilak Marg(New Delhi Distt.)
2022:DHC:5953 ^ (VIAVIDEOCONFERENCIN^ It IS submitted by the learned APP for the state that in the connected matter i.e. W.P.(CRL)-1196-2021 which is filed by petitioners herein seeking quashing ofthe same FIR closure report has been filed before the
Trial Court.
Keeping in view the fact that prosecution has already filed a closure report before the Trial Court and now there is no apprehension of arrest.
Therefore, the present petitions have become infruetuous and are accordingly disposed of. All pending applications(ifany)are also disposed of.
^ I^Jm^BH^TNAGA J JANUARY 6,2022 r O 2022:DHC:5953
JUDGMENT