Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 3380/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 24th February,2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 24th February,2022
W.P.(C) 3380/2022
SHAHZAD ALI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajeet Yadav and Mr. Nishant Tyagi, Advocates.
SHAHZAD ALI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajeet Yadav and Mr. Nishant Tyagi, Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Sanjana Nangia, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Additional
Standing Counsel for R-1 to 3 and 11-13.
Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate for R-4.
Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Standing Counsel with Ms. Malvi Balyan, Advocate for R-5.
Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Advocate for R-9.
Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel for R-10.
Through: Ms. Sanjana Nangia, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Additional
Standing Counsel for R-1 to 3 and 11-13.
Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shubham Sharma, Advocate for R-4.
Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Standing Counsel with Ms. Malvi Balyan, Advocate for R-5.
Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Advocate for R-9.
Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel for R-10.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
JUDGMENT
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.
Proceedings have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 9876/2022 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
2022:DHC:774-DB Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, at the outset, submits that a similar writ petition being W.P.(C) No.3332/2022 was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 23.02.2022, wherein certain directions were passed and urges that similar directions be passed in the present writ petition.
Since we have disposed of a similar writ petition, as aforementioned, we see no reason to entertain the present petition. Suffice it would be to reiterate that the concerned Respondents shall look into the grievances raised by the present Petitioner with regard to the alleged illegal construction and the decision shall be taken after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders including the Petitioner herein.
Needless to state that in case the Respondents come to a conclusion that the construction in question is illegal or unauthorised, necessary action shall be taken in accordance with law.
With these observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 24, 2022 2022:DHC:774-DB
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
2022:DHC:774-DB Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, at the outset, submits that a similar writ petition being W.P.(C) No.3332/2022 was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 23.02.2022, wherein certain directions were passed and urges that similar directions be passed in the present writ petition.
Since we have disposed of a similar writ petition, as aforementioned, we see no reason to entertain the present petition. Suffice it would be to reiterate that the concerned Respondents shall look into the grievances raised by the present Petitioner with regard to the alleged illegal construction and the decision shall be taken after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders including the Petitioner herein.
Needless to state that in case the Respondents come to a conclusion that the construction in question is illegal or unauthorised, necessary action shall be taken in accordance with law.
With these observations, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 24, 2022 2022:DHC:774-DB