Neetu & Ors. v. Oriental Ins Co Ltd & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 25 Mar 2022 · 2022:DHC:1077
Sanjeev Sachdeva
MAC.APP. 88/2022
2022:DHC:1077
civil appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to modify compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the minimum wage of a non-matriculate deceased instead of that of an unskilled worker, remitting the matter for recomputation.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC.APP. 88/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 25th March, 2022
MAC.APP. 88/2022
NEETU & ORS. ..... Appellants
versus
ORIENTAL INS CO LTD & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellants: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate for Ins. Co.
(through VC)
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
CM APPL. 14791/2022 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 14792/2022 (condonation of delay)
The Supreme Court by its orders dated 23.03.2020, 27.04.2021 and 10.01.2022 in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 had suspended the period of limitation in view of the ongoing pandemic.
2022:DHC:1077 Accordingly, there is no delay in filing the appeal.
The application is disposed of.

1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1.

2. Since there is no dispute with regard to the liability of the insurance company, vis-à-vis, driver and owner, service of respondent no. 2 is dispensed with.

3. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for consideration today.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the tribunal has erred in taking the minimum wage of an unskilled worker for computing the compensation whereas admittedly the deceased was a non-matriculate.

5. It is noticed from the impugned award that the tribunal has erred in not noticing the copies of the marksheet and school leaving certificate of the deceased exhibited as Exb. PW1/6 and Exb. PW1/7 for assessing the income of the deceased. However, the very same documents have been taken into account by the tribunal for ascertaining the age of the deceased.

6. Clearly there is an ex-facie error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the impugned award to the said limited extent is not sustainable.

7. The award is accordingly modified taking the minimum wage of the deceased as that of a non-matriculate instead of an unskilled worker.

8. In view of the above, appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted to the tribunal for the purposes of computing the compensation by taking the income of the deceased on the basis of minimum age of a non-matriculate as on the date of the accident instead of the minimum wage of an unskilled worker.

9. The appeal is allowed in the above terms.

10. Parties shall appear before the tribunal for directions on 25.04.2022.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MARCH 25, 2022 ‘rs’