Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 7234/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7234/2022
MANOJ KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba and Ms. Nidh Sharma, Advs.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7234/2022
MANOJ KUMAR YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba and Ms. Nidh Sharma, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb,CGSC, Adv Tushar Sannu and Adv Parvin Bansal
Mr Athurv Insp CRPF, Mr Inderpal And Mr Ramniwas Yadav CRPF
Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb,CGSC, Adv Tushar Sannu and Adv Parvin Bansal
Mr Athurv Insp CRPF, Mr Inderpal And Mr Ramniwas Yadav CRPF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
18.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
18.11.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner seeks re-fixation of seniority without impleading necessary parties.
2. Accordingly, it is well-settled in State of Rajasthan v Ucchab Lal Chhanwal[1], Vijay Kumar Kaul v Union of India[2], Indu Shekhar Singh v State of U.P.3, J.S. Yadav v State of U.P[4] and Padam Singh Jhina v Union of India[5], that in cases of seniority unless necessary parties are impleaded, the petition is not maintainable.
(1974) 1 SLR 594 (SC) W.P.(C) 7234/2022
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to re-institute the petition after impleading necessary parties.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J NOVEMBER 18, 2025