Salim Malik v. State

Delhi High Court · 26 Apr 2022 · 2022:DHC:5970
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
APPLN.299/2022
2022:DHC:5970
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court permitted petitioners to withdraw their bail applications without prejudice before supplementary witness statements were recorded, allowing them to file fresh applications later.

Full Text
Translation output
$-6 and 23 nr HIGH COURT OF DELHI RATT, APPLN.299/2022 . .
PcliUoncr
Through: Mr.Salim Malik,Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent
Through; Mr. Amit Mahajan and Mr. Rajat Nair, SPPs for the State along with
Mr.Dhruv Pande,Advocate.
JUDGMENT

4 RAIL APPLN.3034/2021. IMRAN@CHIRA. ^ etitioncr Through; Mr.Salim Malik,Advocate.

VERSUS

STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan and Mr. Rajat Nair, SPPs for the State along with Mr.Dhruv Pande. Advocate. CORAM" HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATFA ORDER 0/„ 26.04.2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since-the impugned orders dismissingthe bailapplicationswere passed bythe learned trial court, prior to filing ofthe supplementary statements ofthe witnesses on record. 2022:DHC:5970 r \0 permission maybegrantedto withdrawthepresentbail applications. In view of above, the present bail applications arc dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights and contentions ofthe petitioners and with a libertyto file afresh,ifso advised. K-— ' ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA,.1. APRIL 26,2022 j