Ram Prakash Bharti v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 31 Aug 2022 · 2022:DHC:3374-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
W.P.(C) 12583/2022
2022:DHC:3374-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for promotion and medical examination, mandating the competent authority to decide within a fixed timeframe, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 12583/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 31.08.2022
W.P.(C) 12583/2022 & CM APPL. 38089/2022
RAM PRAKASH BHARTI FORCE NO. 880924754 ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .... Respondents
Through: Mr. Naginder Benipal, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms. Rupali Kapoor, GP and Mr. Abhijeet Vikram Singh, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to grant the next promotion to the petitioner and to medically examine the petitioner and prepare a final report.

2. In view of the submissions made in the present petition and the prayer sought, based on the new facts we hereby direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the competent authority for the aforesaid relief(s) within two weeks from today and on receipt of the same, the competent authority is directed to decide the same within four weeks thereafter and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 2022:DHC:3374-DB W.P.(C) 12583/2022

3. Needless to say, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision to be taken, he may approach the appropriate forum.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition and pending application are disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE AUGUST 31, 2022