Vantala Ramanna v. Director General CISF

Delhi High Court · 13 Sep 2022 · 2022:DHC:3646-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
W.P.(C) 13279/2022
2022:DHC:3646-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within three weeks and stayed the transfer order pending such decision.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 13279/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: September 13, 2022
W.P.(C) 13279/2022
VANTALA RAMANNA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Advocate
VERSUS
DIRECTOR GENERAL CISF & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, GP with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Insp.
CISF
Mr. Prahlad Devenda, SI, CISF
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM APPL. 40261/2022 & CM APPL. 40262/2022(for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The applications are accordingly disposed of. W.P.(C) 13279/2022 & CM APPL. 40260/2022 (for seeking interim exparte order)

3. Present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents, DG CISF, New Delhi to post the petitioner at any CISF units of South Sector or within South Eastern Sector or Central Sector in terms of circular dated 25.09.2017. The petitioner further seeks direction to quash and set aside the orders dated 28.03.2022, 02.04.2022, 16.04.2022 and movement order dated 07.09.2022 wherein he has been transferred from the present 2022:DHC:3646-DB W.P.(C) 13279/2022 unit of IGI Airport New Delhi to 9th Reserve Battallion, Deoli, Rajasthan and to direct respondent no.1 to pass a speaking order against the representation dated 31.07.2022.

4. For the aforesaid relief, the petitioner made a representation dated 31.07.2022, however, till date, the said representation has not been decided.

5. Mr. Abhigyan Siddhant, learned Counsel appearing on advance notice and on instructions, submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided within three weeks from today.

6. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition by directing the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31.07.2022 within the time sought and further to transmit the said decision to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

7. Till then, movement order dated 07.09.2022 shall remain stayed.

8. In view of above, petition is disposed of alongwith the pending application.

9. Needless to state that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE SEPTEMBER 13, 2022