Kamla Pasricha & Anr v. Surendera Nath Pasricha & Anr

Delhi High Court · 26 Sep 2022 · 2022:DHC:3899-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
RFA(OS) 32/2018
2022:DHC:3899-DB
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of the appeal subject to setting aside adverse observations in paragraphs 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment, confirming the rest of the decree in a family property dispute.

Full Text
Translation output
RFA(OS) 32/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: September 26, 2022
RFA(OS) 32/2018
KAMLA PASRICHA & ANR ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocate
VERSUS
SURENDERA NATH PASRICHA & ANR ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Satvik Varma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants on instructions, does not dispute the impugned judgement dated 15.03.2018 and seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal, if this court sets aside paras 14 and 15 thereof.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1 submits that he has no objection if the appellants withdraw the present appeal with the aforesaid observations mentioned in paras 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment dated 15.03.2018 being set aside.

3. The appellant no.1 is a senior citizen aged about 84 years and appellant no.2 is the daughter of appellant no.1, who is aged 55 years. It is 2022:DHC:3899-DB RFA(OS) 32/2018 pertinent to mention here that impugned judgment dated 15.03.2018 was stayed by this Court vide order dated 13.07.2018, but by that time, respondent no.1 had taken the possession of the suit property.

4. Accordingly, keeping in view the observations made in paras 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment dated 15.03.2018 which are against both the ladies and since the issues are between family members, just to give quietus to the issues, we hereby set aside paras 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment dated 15.03.2018.

5. It is made clear that the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2018 except paras 14 and 15 thereof is confirmed.

6. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE SEPTEMBER 26, 2022