Anish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 27 Sep 2022 · 2022:DHC:3990-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee
W.P.(C) 13937/2022
2022:DHC:3990-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking disability pension relief, holding that the matter falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal under Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 13937/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: September 27, 2022
W.P.(C) 13937/2022
ANISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INIDA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. T. P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt.
Counsel and Ms. Priya Mishra, GP with Major Partho Katyayan, for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM APPL. 42639/2022(for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

3. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release disability pension alongwith arrears to the petitioner since the disability of the petitioner was admittedly attributed to military service as per the report of the Medical Board constituted by the respondent Army and a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat this writ petition as a fresh representation and to decide 2022:DHC:3990-DB this representation in a time bound manner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was invalidated from service on 04.12.2019 and thereafter he made a representation dated 07.01.2022 seeking release of disability pension with arrears, however, the representation has not been decided till date.

5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present petition is not maintainable in view of Section 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. He further submits that representation dated 07.01.2022 has been replied vide communication dated 03.03.2022 and the same has been produced before this Court. Copy of the same is also given to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file the same before the appropriate forum, if so advised.

7. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SAURABH BANERJEE)

JUDGE SEPTEMBER 27, 2022