Ankur Tiwari & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 28 Nov 2025 · 2025:DHC:10632
Ravinder Dudeja
CRL.M.C. 8476/2025
2025:DHC:10632
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 8476/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 28.11.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, CRL.M.C. 8476/2025
ANKUR TIWARI & ORS. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Adv. (appearance not given Petitioners in person.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF(NCT OF DELHI)& ANR … Respondents
Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP
WITH
SI Ritika Chaudhary, P.S. New
Ashok Vihar.
Ms. Ria Goyal, Adv. for R-2
WITH
R-2 in person.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 281/2022, dated 03.03.2022, registered at P.S Ashok Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 10.07.2018 as per Hindu Rites and ceremonies at Noida, Uttar Pradesh. One child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since January 2020.

3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. FIR No. 281/2022 was lodged at the instance of respondent no. 2 at PS Ashok Nagar under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners.

4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and the terms of settlement were written in the form of Compromise deed dated 16.04.2025. It is submitted that petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 have obtained divorce on 23.08.2025 and the petitioner no. 1 has paid the entire settlement amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lacs only)to respondent no. 2 and the permanent custody of the child will remain with respondent no.2 and petitioner no.1 shall have the visitation rights as per the schedule in the settlement. Copy of the compromise deed dated 16.04.2025 has been annexed as Annexure P-2.

5. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Ritika Chaudhary from PS New Ashok Nagar.

6. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has received the entire settlement and has no objection if the FIR NO. 281/2022is quashed against the Petitioners.

7. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 281/2022 is quashed.

8. Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable settlement of disputes in Rangappa Javoor vs The State Of Karnataka And Another, Diary No. 33313/2019, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 74, Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs Babita Raghuvanshi &Anr., (2013) 4 SCC 58 & in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC

303.

9. Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC.

10. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings emanating thereto.

11. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR NO. 281/2022, dated 03.03.2022, registered at P.S Ashok Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

12. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

13. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.