Managing Committee The Delhi University Co-Operative Store Ltd v. Asian Enterprises

Delhi High Court · 08 Dec 2022 · 2022:DHC:5468
Tushar Rao Gedela
CM(M) 1205/2022
2022:DHC:5468
civil appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's forfeiture of the defendants' right to file a written statement and directed the extension application to be decided on merits, emphasizing adjudication on substantive rights over procedural defaults.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number 2022/DHC/005468
CM(M) 1205/2022 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 08.12.2022
CM(M) 1205/2022 & CM APPL. 48371/2022
MANAGING COMMITTEE THE DELHI UNIVERSITY CO- OPERATIVE STORE LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners
versus
ASIAN ENTERPRISES & ANR. ..... Respondents For the Petitioners : Mohammad Ali, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Goswami and Ms. Prachi Gupta, Advocates.
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Respondents : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
JUDGMENT

1. With the consent of parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner impugns the order dated 15.09.2022, whereby the right to file the written statement on behalf of defendant Nos. 1 to 3, before the learned Trial Court, was forfeited.

3. Vide the same order the learned Trial Court had listed the matter further for plaintiff’s evidence and simultaneously, permitted the defendants to cross examine the witnesses on very limited rights.

4. Mr. Randhir Kumar, learned counsel appears for the respondents CM(M) 1205/2022 2 submits that subsequent to the impugned order, the petitioner herein filed an application seeking extension of time to take the written statement on record, which is still pending adjudication and, no orders have been passed thereon.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he would have no objection, if the pending application is taken up for hearing and decided on its own merits. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is also agreeable to that.

6. In view the above, the impugned order, whereby the learned Trial Court has directed forfeiture of the rights of the petitioners to file their written statement is set aside.

7. Since it is informed that on the date when the impugned order was passed, the statutory time period for condonation of delay in filing the application under the provisions of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, was still open to the petitioners and coupled with the fact that an application for seeking extension of time was also filed subsequently and is pending, this Court is of the opinion that the interest of justice would be sub-served in directing the learned Trial Court to take up the application seeking extension of time for filing the written statement and decided on its own merits.

8. It is further informed that the next date before the learned Trial Court is fixed for 12.12.2022. It is requested that the learned Trial Court takes up the application seeking extension of time and decide the same on its own merits, in accordance with law.

9. In view of the above directions, the petition is allowed and disposed of, subject to costs of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the respondent by the CM(M) 1205/2022 3 petitioner within two days. This is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners.

10. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J DECEMBER 08, 2022