Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 18th January, 2023
2230/2023 DR. RAKESH KISHORE ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person.
Through: Advocate for R-2 (Appearance not given)
JUDGMENT
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner - Dr. Rakesh Kishore seeking directions to the Respondent No. 2 – Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Delhi to initiate action against Respondent Nos.[3] to
7.
3. The Petitioner is a resident of River View Apartments which is run by the Arur Cooperative Group Housing Society in Mayur Vihar-I, Extension, Delhi-110091 (hereinafter, “Arur Society”). He was president of Arur Society for three years between 2nd December, 2018 to 1st December, 2021.
4. The case of the Petitioner is that the multistorey apartment complex i.e. River View Apartments which is run by Arur Society was mismanaged by Respondent Nos. 3 to 7. He seeks to rely on the fact that the said apartment complex did not have Fire Safety Certificate from 2004 till 2021 and the management i.e. Respondent Nos. 3 to 7 did not take any action to obtain the said Fire Safety Certificate. Thus, the management of the Society during the period from 2005 to 2018 were negligent in their duties and failed to take care of the safety and security of the residents of the River View Apartments complex. Hence the Petitioner prays that action be directed against them.
5. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 submits that the Fire Safety Certificate has now been obtained and the same has been renewed for a period of five years with effect from 6th August, 2021. However, he concedes that for a very long duration, the Fire Safety Certificate was not renewed. He further submits that the Petitioner made a representation to the Respondent No. 2 on 28th March, 2022 under Section 70 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003.
6. The Petitioner who has appeared in person relies upon the Rule 102(1) of the Delhi Cooperative societies Rules, 2007 which imposes the obligation upon the management of the society to provide for proper fire safety. The said Rule reads as under:
7. It goes without saying that in such apartment complexes the maintenance expenses are usually charged from the residents in order to ensure proper maintenance and other amenities such the fire safety equipment. There can be no doubt that the apartment complexes of this nature which are occupied by hundreds of residents ought to comply with the necessary fire safety norms. Thus, the fact that for a number of years, there was no Fire Safety Certificate for this building, is a cause of concern.
8. Since the Petitioner has already made a representation to the Respondent No.2, the concerned authorities shall enquire into this matter and take action in accordance with law. The decision in this respect shall be taken on or before 31st May, 2023.
9. The petition, with all pending applications, is disposed of. The remedies of all parties are left open.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE JANUARY 18, 2023 Rahul/KT