Yogesh Gaur & Anr. v. The Principal District and Sessions Judge East District & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 13 Mar 2023 · 2023:DHC:1917
Prathiba M. Singh
W.P.(C) 1782/2021
2023:DHC:1917
administrative other Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of chamber allotment to nephews of a deceased advocate and ordered investigation into alleged misuse and corruption in Karkardooma Court chambers, emphasizing strict adherence to allotment rules.

Full Text
Translation output
2023:DHC:1917
W.P.(C) 1782/2021
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 13th March, 2023
W.P.(C) 1782/2021 and CM APPL. 5125/2021
YOGESH GAUR & ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Petitioner in person. [M:
9999310496]
VERSUS
THE LD. PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE EAST
DISTRICT & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC with Ms. Pallavii Singh, Advocate for R-1. [M:
9643238429]
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by two Petitioners, Mr. Yogesh Gaur- Petitioner No.1, and Mr. Praveen Gaur- Petitioner No.2, who are practicing advocates in the Karkardooma Courts. By way of the present petition, the Petitioners seek quashing of the proclamation notice dated 21st January, 2021 by which it was proclaimed that the possession of Chamber No. D-210 vested with the Principal and Sessions Judge East District, Karkardooma Court Complex, Delhi.

3. It is their case that their uncle (Chacha)- Mr. Surender Kumar Sharma was the allottee of chamber no. D-210, Block-E Second Floor, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter ‘subject chamber’) who passed away on 1st November, 2021. The Petitioners’ uncle was unmarried and he died intestate and issueless. It is submitted by Petitioner No.1, who appears in person, that, since inception i.e., 2009 and 2014, the Petitioners were working with their uncle and after his demise, have taken over his practice. Various documents, including ration card, have been placed on record to show that the Petitioners’ family and their uncle lived together as a joint family right till the demise of the uncle. He submits that the Petitioners would be severely impacted in their professional career if the chamber allotted to their uncle is not allotted to them after his demise.

4. It is also alleged that the attempt to dispossess the Petitioners from the chamber is also mala fide inasmuch as in the Karkardooma Courts Complex several chambers are being misused. Paragraph 11 of the writ petition mentions the nature of allegations and the alleged activity being carried out in the chambers inside the Karkardooma Courts. The said paragraph is extracted below:

“11. …It is most pertinent to mention here that there are a number of chambers in the karkardooma court complex which are still laying vacant and unclaimed for a number of years after the death of the original allottee(s) of those chambers because of an ILLEGAL NEXUS between some corrupt and cunning nature employees serving in the General Branch, Care Taking Branch and other offices or branches responsible for administration and maintenance of the entire Court Premises including the Lawyers Chambers Block Karkardooma Courts Complex AND some non- practising advocates who are illegally occupying those vacant and unclaimed chambers and using them to run various types of unlawful activities like selling and consuming liquor organising gambling up to late night hours and commercial activities of selling and purchasing goods, selling tea and other eatables, installing Photostat Machines, Providing mobile recharging, electricity and water bill depositing facilities, etc. It is most pertinent to mention here that some of the vacant and unclaimed chambers have been given on rent to some young lawyers and the
rent is being charged, collected, extracted, received and distributed amongst them in form of money, liquor and other gift articles by those corrupt and cunning nature employees and some non- practising advocates as aforesaid. Such corrupt employees keep the concerned responsible officer or authority or The District and Sessions Judge, In-charge/ Chairperson in dark by not providing and concealing the real status of such vacant and unclaimed chambers to them rather they misguide the authority concerned by providing manipulated information based on pick and choose policy and the self-concocted story. They are letting out the said vacant and unclaimed chambers and receiving the money from them in form of rent from alleged occupiers. Therefore the eligible advocates are deprived of the chamber facility. On the other hand such occupiers are misusing the said chamber by running commercial activities as aforesaid in those chambers which are prohibited according to District Courts Karkardooma Lawyers Chamber (Allotment and Occupancy) Rules 1995 (Amended) and other relevant laws. Those vacant and unclaimed chambers are the source of their aforesaid illegal nexus members therefore they always remain active in search of an opportunity of obtaining vacant chambers so that they can keep them unclaimed one by keeping the authority concerned in dark or by misguiding them and then, on getting opportunity, they may let out those ones and receive money in form of rent or gift best suited to them time to time. On the other side, due to the above said Illegal Nexus between those corrupt employees And the non-practising Advocates as aforesaid, the multi-story Parking Area and the other Open Space available in and around the Karkardooma Court Complex is also being illegally used for running Unauthorised Chargeable Parking and committing other illegal and highly objectionable activities including selling and consuming liquor, organising gambling up to late night hours activities by Non-Advocates and Outsiders. A large number of unclaimed and abandoned vehicles can easily be found parked and scraped there which may be used to cause any unwarranted dangerous incident any time in the court premises. Similarly many unauthorised chargeable kiosks and shops for selling tea, coffee, bakery and snacks eatables and stationery items inside and around the court premises and also inside every Chamber Block on their almost each and every floor have been established and allowed to run illegally subject to payment of money, gift etc., suitable consideration to the members of the said illegal Nexus between those corrupt employees And the nonpractising Advocates as aforesaid. Those tea, coffee sellers illegally and dangerously use LPG Cylinders with gas stoves for cooking bakery or snacks items, commit water theft to clean utensils and electricity theft to use electric kettle etc., for cooking or preparing tea or coffee which cause pollution as well. They violate the Child Labour Laws by forcing minor poor children in such tea selling act. The credentials of these tea or coffee sellers and their workers are not verified at all. Hence these illegal and unauthorised activities performed by or due to the said ILLGAL NEXUS between those corrupt employees And the nonpractising Advocates as aforesaid is a serious threat to the life and assets of the practising Lawyers, court staffs, public at large and also to the judicial officers and their respective family members living in the adjacent accommodation inside the court premises. The responsible members of the Executive Committee of the Bar Association also does not want to be indulged in strictly dealing with such aforesaid illegal nexus either under the impression of vote bank policy of not to annoy any advocate voter or for the reasons best known to them which may be revealed if proper investigation is launched by the authorities concerned in accordance with law applicable to the same effect. It is most pertinent to mention here that due to the conduction of aforesaid illegal activities in the entire court premises the then Hon'ble District and Sessions Judge (East) SH. Rakesh Tiwari Karkardooma Court had to issue a Circular vide no. 8858 - 8871 / D&SJ / (East) / KKD /Delhi dated 17-07-2018 under the heading printed at its top " MOST URGENT/ OUT AT ONCE " and the copy of the said circular obtained from the official website of the East District Court is enclosed as Annexure-12. Whereas the copy of the Circular dated 27-11-2020 vide no. 7144 - 7153 / PD&SJ (East) / KKD / Delhi enclosed herewith as Annexure- P13 shows that the respondents no. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8 here in this writ petition are also the Chairperson / In-Charge and Members of the Building Maintenance Committee KKD Courts Delhi. Hence, the aforesaid responsible authority concerned should launch a detailed investigation and then take strict legal action accordingly against all the members of the said ILLEGAL NEXUS exist between those corrupt employees And the non-practising Advocates as aforesaid so the said illegal nexus may come to an end and justice can be delivered to the aggrieved persons and also the proper safety of the life and assets of the practising Lawyers, court staffs, public at large and also to the judicial officers and their respective family members living in the adjacent accommodation inside the court premises can be ensured”

5. It is the case of the Petitioners that genuine cases like that of the Petitioners’ is not being considered but objectionable activities are being permitted in the chambers. It is alleged that several chambers have been permitted to be occupied by unauthorised occupants as well. Thus, it is alleged that the Petitioners who were treated by their uncle as his sons ought to be permitted to retain the chamber in terms of the District Court Shahdara Lawyers (Allotment and Occupancy) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter ‘Rules’), though, the Rules recognise in 2nd proviso to Rule 5(b) that only the father/mother/son/daughter/ husband/ or wife of the deceased would be entitled to allotment of the same chamber.

6. On Behalf of the Respondents, Mr. Satyakam, ld. ASC submits that the Chamber Allotment Committee works strictly as per the Rules which are clear to the effect that the only persons who are entitled to get the allotment of the same chamber as that of the deceased are the father, mother, son, daughter, husband, and the wife of the deceased. Admittedly, the Petitioners are the nephews of the deceased allottee. Thus, there is no irregularity in the action of the Respondents seeking the Petitioners to vacate the subject chamber. Insofar as the allegations made in paragraph 11 is concerned, it is fairly submitted by Mr. Satyakam, ld. ASC that they are very serious in nature.

7. Accordingly, considering the nature of this matter, the following directions are issued: i. Let the Chamber Allotment Committee consider the case of the Petitioners for transfer of the allotment of the subject chamber in these facts and place its decision on record by the next date of hearing. ii. The nature of allegations made in Paragraph 11 are serious in nature. Let the Principal District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, conduct a physical inspection, by himself or through authorized officials, of each of the chambers and place a report on record bearing in mind the allegations made in paragraph 11 of the present writ petition. The inspection shall be done in a surprise and discreet manner. The said report shall be placed in a sealed cover only for the perusal of this Court by the next date of hearing.

8. An advance copy of the decision qua the Petitioners shall be supplied to the Petitioners.

9. Interim order to continue.

10. The rejoinder filed by the Petitioners be placed on record.

11. Let fresh notice be issued to all the Respondents once again. If any of the other Bar Associations wish to file a response to the present writ petition, they are permitted to do so.

12. List before Registrar on 24th April, 2023.

13. List before Court on 25th May, 2023.

11,023 characters total

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE MARCH 13, 2023 dj/sk